2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2011.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two level scheme solvers for nuclear spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S g1g2ḡ3 = S g1g2 − S g1g2g3 = g 1 g 2 (1 − g 3 ) S g1g3ḡ2 = S g1g3 − S g1g2g3 = g 1 g 3 (1 − g 2 ) S g2g3ḡ1 = S g2g3 − S g1g2g3 = g 2 g 3 (1 − g 1 ) which are specific examples of the general relation (6). We recover the final result:…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…S g1g2ḡ3 = S g1g2 − S g1g2g3 = g 1 g 2 (1 − g 3 ) S g1g3ḡ2 = S g1g3 − S g1g2g3 = g 1 g 3 (1 − g 2 ) S g2g3ḡ1 = S g2g3 − S g1g2g3 = g 2 g 3 (1 − g 1 ) which are specific examples of the general relation (6). We recover the final result:…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…• Combined spectrum expressed as a sum of exclusive elementary spectra: Note that for such a reduced list of gates, the final result can easily be obtained in a pedestrian approach, applying intuitively the development of exclusive spectra involving one closed gate: which are specific examples of the general relation (6). We recover the final result:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation