2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2020.103484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-level substructuring and parallel mesh generation for domain decomposition methods

Abstract: This paper presents a new parallel mesh generation method leading to subdomains of shape well-suited to Schur based domain decomposition methods such as the FETI and BDD solvers. Starting from a coarse mesh, subdomains meshes are created in parallel through hierarchical mesh refinement and morphing techniques. The proposed methodology aims at limiting the occurrence of known pathological situations (jagged interfaces, misplaced heterogeneity with respect to the interfaces, . . . ) that penalize the convergence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hybrid method takes both advantage of direct and iterative schemes, which can improve parallel efficiency. And thus, it has been widely used in the finite elements structural field [2,[15][16][17][18][19]. Based on the CDDA, Miao et al [15] designed a hierarchical parallel calculation method in finite element analysis for static structures.…”
Section: Hhpamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The hybrid method takes both advantage of direct and iterative schemes, which can improve parallel efficiency. And thus, it has been widely used in the finite elements structural field [2,[15][16][17][18][19]. Based on the CDDA, Miao et al [15] designed a hierarchical parallel calculation method in finite element analysis for static structures.…”
Section: Hhpamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was later applied to a high-rise building to find its parallel solution to static structural characteristics. El Gharbi et al [16] utilized the CDDA to design a two-level parallel mesh algorithm. And they applied the algorithm to complete the mesh for a turbine blade.…”
Section: Hhpamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure (1 -b) represents the final mesh using an exact solver, Figure (1 -c) (respectively (1 -d)) represents the deformed mesh for the same number of steps but using a randomized direct solver with Gaussian (respectively Hadamard) random projectors, while keeping only 10% of the RBF matrix columns (which corresponds to l = 0.1n c ). The randomized mesh deformation approach had a similar behavior in terms of mesh quality distribution to the exact solver with an expected relative error up to 10 By decreasing the compression ratio, we were able to improve the accuracy of the randomized solver with an estimated error up to 10 −4 as shown in Table (2), but no significant improvement was noticed in terms of mesh quality distribution.…”
Section: Numerical Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 79%