2012
DOI: 10.1515/jgt.2011.097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two local conditions on the vertex stabiliser of arc-transitive graphs and their effect on the Sylow subgroups

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we study G-arc-transitive graphs D where the permutation group G DðxÞ x induced by the stabiliser G x of the vertex x on the neighbourhood DðxÞ satisfies the two conditions given in the introduction. We show that for such a G-arc-transitive graph D, if ðx; yÞ is an arc of D, then the subgroup G ½1 x; y of G fixing DðxÞ and Dð yÞ point-wise is a p-group for some prime p. Next we prove that every G-locally primitive (respectively quasiprimitive, semiprimitive) graph satisfies our two loca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following counterexample is due to Pyber: let G = Sym(2n + 1) and A = H ∪ {σ, σ −1 }, where σ is the shift m → m+2 mod 2n+1 and H is the subgroup generated by all transpositions (i, i+1) with 1 ≤ i ≤ n. Then |A 3 | ≪ |A|. See also [PPSS12,§3] and [Spi12].…”
Section: Some Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following counterexample is due to Pyber: let G = Sym(2n + 1) and A = H ∪ {σ, σ −1 }, where σ is the shift m → m+2 mod 2n+1 and H is the subgroup generated by all transpositions (i, i+1) with 1 ≤ i ≤ n. Then |A 3 | ≪ |A|. See also [PPSS12,§3] and [Spi12].…”
Section: Some Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume for a contradiction that this is false. Then [35,Corollary 2] shows that there is a prime p such that G [1] xy and F * (G xy ) non-trivial are p-groups. If F * (G xy ) G [1] x , then we have that F * (G xy ) = G [1] x and so [12,…”
Section: Graph-theoretical Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction used in the proof is a generalisation of the construction that appeared in [13,Section 4] (in fact, Theorem 1.3 generalises [13, Theorem 4]) which in turn was inspired by the so-called wreath extension construction [11,Chapter IV,8.1]. A precursory idea to this construction can also be traced to [19,Section 4]. Theorem 1.7 naturally leads one to wonder about the corresponding statement for amalgams of rank greater than two.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%