1982
DOI: 10.1143/ptp.67.609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Loop Anomalous Dimensions of Timelike Cut Vertices and Scaling Violation of Fragmentation Functions in QCD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in contrast to the case of initial state hadrons, where the evolution equations for the scaledependence of the PDFs are controlled by space-like kinematics, Q 2 ≤ 0, the scale evolution of the FFs with Q 2 ≥ 0 requires the so-called time-like splitting functions. These functions are known completely at two loops [9][10][11][51][52][53], see also refs. [54,55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, in contrast to the case of initial state hadrons, where the evolution equations for the scaledependence of the PDFs are controlled by space-like kinematics, Q 2 ≤ 0, the scale evolution of the FFs with Q 2 ≥ 0 requires the so-called time-like splitting functions. These functions are known completely at two loops [9][10][11][51][52][53], see also refs. [54,55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Then in the 1980 it has been shown by Curci, Furmanski and Petronzio [14] that the Gribov-Lipatov relation is violated. In that period several groups obtained the NLO contributions to the 'timelike' splitting functions [14,15,16,17,18,19]. In 2004 the NNLO "spacelike" splitting functions were published by Moch, Vermaseren and Vogt in Ref.…”
Section: Exiting Times For "Timelike" Qcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 -4 at a standard reference scale, Q 2 ≃ M 2 Z , for n f = 5 effectively massless flavours. For the corresponding value α s ≃ 0.12 of the strong coupling constant, the expansions to order α 16 s are sufficient, and for some of the NNLL results required, for an accuracy of 0.1% or better down to the lowest x-values shown, x = 10 −4 . An extension of the maximal order to cover one more order of magnitude in x is definitely feasible, but does not appear to be warranted for any foreseeable analyses of experimental data.…”
Section: Resummed Timelike Splitting Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1.4) The leading-order (LO) and NLO contributions P (0) T and P (1) T to Eq. (1.4) have been known for a long time [12][13][14][15][16]. A direct calculation of the NNLO corrections P (2) T has not been performed so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%