2020
DOI: 10.1007/jhep11(2020)045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-loop mixed QCD-EW corrections to gg → Hg

Abstract: We compute the two-loop mixed QCD-Electroweak (QCD-EW) corrections to the production of a Higgs boson and a gluon in gluon fusion through a loop of light quarks. The relevant four-point functions with internal massive propagators are expressed as multiple polylogarithms with algebraic arguments. We perform the calculation by integration over Feynman parameters and, independently, by the method of differential equations. We compute the two independent helicity amplitudes for the process and we find that they ar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the expected challenges when considering such integrals is the introduction of many square roots in the alphabet of the resulting canonical differential equations. It remains a non-trivial exercise to find a universal way to handle these roots and achieve a result in terms of Goncharov polylogarithms, however several ideas have been put forward in recent times [41][42][43][44]. One should also keep in mind that even if a so-called dlog form of the differential equations is achieved, it does not guarantee that its solution will be in terms of Goncharov polylogarithms [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the expected challenges when considering such integrals is the introduction of many square roots in the alphabet of the resulting canonical differential equations. It remains a non-trivial exercise to find a universal way to handle these roots and achieve a result in terms of Goncharov polylogarithms, however several ideas have been put forward in recent times [41][42][43][44]. One should also keep in mind that even if a so-called dlog form of the differential equations is achieved, it does not guarantee that its solution will be in terms of Goncharov polylogarithms [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to achieve a result in such a form we need to find a way to deal JHEP10(2021)041 with these square roots. Several ideas have been put forward recently that are able to circumvent this problem and provide solutions in terms of Goncharov polylogarithms [41][42][43][44] for specific cases, however a universal method to treat the problem of square roots appearing in the alphabet of canonical differential equations for multiscale families of Feynman integrals is still missing.…”
Section: Families C E G Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the expected challenges when considering such integrals is the introduction of many square roots in the alphabet of the resulting canonical differential equations. It remains a nontrivial exercise to find a universal way to handle these roots and achieve a result in terms of Goncharov polylogarithms, however several ideas have been put forward in recent times [41][42][43][44]. One should also keep in mind that even if a so-called dlog form of the differential equations is achieved, it does not guarantee that its solution will be in terms of Goncharov polylogarithms [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to achieve a result in such a form we need to find a way to deal with these square roots. Several ideas have been put forward recently that are able to circumvent this problem and provide solutions in terms of Goncharov polylogarithms [41][42][43][44] for specific cases, however a universal method to treat the problem of square roots appearing in the alphabet of canonical differential equations for multiscale families of Feynman integrals is still missing.…”
Section: Families C E G Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A revolution in direct integration methods, based for example on the well known Feynman-Schwinger parametrisation, has happened with the establishment of the criterion of linear reducibility [67] for Feynman integrals and the development of algorithms to exploit it to compute Feynman integrals in terms of MPLs [68]. Many important calculations have been performed thanks to this insight, recent examples are various form factor integrals up to four loops [69] and 2 → 2 scattering amplitudes with masses [70].…”
Section: Calculational Techniques In Particle Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%