1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4115(05)80017-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Modes of Perceiving the Self

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In perceiving selfmovement, one typically has an ego view, whereas in perceiving the movement of objects or others one generally has an observer view. This distinction is reminiscent of Bertenthal's (1993) idea of knowledgebased constraints in perceiving point light information, and also fits with the idea that there are two modes of perceiving the self: one for controlling actions and another for recognizing objects (Bertenthal, 1996;Bertenthal & Rose, 1995). Along these lines, perceiving-for-action might (at an early age) be essentially tied to ego-centered information, with recognition of self-movement-arguably a prerequisite for perceivingfor-action-also constrained by such information.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In perceiving selfmovement, one typically has an ego view, whereas in perceiving the movement of objects or others one generally has an observer view. This distinction is reminiscent of Bertenthal's (1993) idea of knowledgebased constraints in perceiving point light information, and also fits with the idea that there are two modes of perceiving the self: one for controlling actions and another for recognizing objects (Bertenthal, 1996;Bertenthal & Rose, 1995). Along these lines, perceiving-for-action might (at an early age) be essentially tied to ego-centered information, with recognition of self-movement-arguably a prerequisite for perceivingfor-action-also constrained by such information.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Research demonstrated that by the third month, and possibly from birth, infants have a sense of their own agency (Siqueland and DeLucia, 1969;Kalnins and Bruner, 1973;Lewis et al, 1985), and of their own body as an object among others. In support of such precocious differentiation, neonates have been reported to respond differentially to actual movements of their own body and to movements of external objects that are not accompanied by contingent vestibular stimulation (Jouen and Gapenne, 1995; see also Harris et al, 1974, Kellman et al, 1987and Bertenthal and Rose, 1995 for similar evidence with 4-month-old infants). Consistent with such findings in support of an early sense of the own body as a differentiated entity, Rochat and Hespos (1997) found that neonates and 4-week-old infants were rooting differentially to self-vs. external cutaneous stimulation of the perioral region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is important to emphasize that for successful performance in the moving room task it is not necessary for the direction or the amplitude of the postural sway to be perceived explicitly. Rather, the key is that both dimensions are used implicitly by the visuomotor system to produce the appropriate compensatory actions (Bertenthal & Rose, 1995; Lee, 1993). It is necessary to detect both the orientation and the inertia of the trunk to restore it to a more stable posture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%