2019
DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2019.573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Abstract: In this paper we describe two new tardigrade species belonging to the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex: Macrobiotus noongaris sp. nov. from Perth, Australia, and Macrobiotus kamilae sp. nov. from Mussoorie, India. Live specimens extracted from moss samples were used to establish laboratory cultures in order to obtain additional animals and eggs needed for their integrative descriptions. These descriptions are based on traditional morphological and morphometric data collected using both light and scanning electron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 719 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mac. joannae Pilato and Binda, 1983, known only from the type locality in Australia (Pilato and Binda [69]; see also comments in Nowak and Stec [68]), by lower average pt of stylet support insertion points (80.2 in the new species vs. 81.9 in Mac. joannae), smaller size of macroplacoid 1 and microplacoid (8.2-16.0 and 2.4-4.9 µm, respectively, in the new species vs. 19.3 and 6.4 µm, respectively, in Mac.…”
Section: Genetic Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Mac. joannae Pilato and Binda, 1983, known only from the type locality in Australia (Pilato and Binda [69]; see also comments in Nowak and Stec [68]), by lower average pt of stylet support insertion points (80.2 in the new species vs. 81.9 in Mac. joannae), smaller size of macroplacoid 1 and microplacoid (8.2-16.0 and 2.4-4.9 µm, respectively, in the new species vs. 19.3 and 6.4 µm, respectively, in Mac.…”
Section: Genetic Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The dried slides were sealed with transparent nail polish and examined under a Leica DMLB light microscope with PCM and a digital camera. Immediately after mounting the specimens in the medium, the slides were checked under PCM for the presence of males and females in the studied population, as the spermatozoa in the testis or ovotestis are visible only for a few hours after mounting [ 12 , 24 ]. To obtain clean and extended specimens for SEM, tardigrades were processed according to the protocol by Stec et al [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slides were examined under an Olympus BX53 light microscope with phase contrast (PCM), associated with an Olympus DP74 digital camera. Immediately after mounting the specimens in the medium, slides were checked under PCM for the presence of males and females in the studied population [61,80]. Specimens for the SEM analysis were processed according to the protocol by Stec et al [49].…”
Section: Microscopy and Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%