1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00625279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two notions of correctness and their relation to testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
119
0
7

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
119
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This enables the flexible implementation of the loop, first explored by Weyuker [21] and Budd and Angluin [3], of linking model inference to test generation. We provide an instantiation of this framework that shows how the WEKA implementation fo the C4.5 algorithm [12] can be linked up to Z3 [5] to generate test sets for three programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This enables the flexible implementation of the loop, first explored by Weyuker [21] and Budd and Angluin [3], of linking model inference to test generation. We provide an instantiation of this framework that shows how the WEKA implementation fo the C4.5 algorithm [12] can be linked up to Z3 [5] to generate test sets for three programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until the mid-nineties this work was predominantly theoretical [3], [21], [4], [15], [14], [23], [22]. This developed strong theoretical underpinnings for test adequacy in an inference context (by linking to Machine-Learning notions such as Probably Approximately Correct learning, for example [23], [18]).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These mutants are called equivalent mutants and need to be identified and eliminated if possible. Budd and Angluin [9] proved that detecting equivalent mutants is an undecidable problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that deducing mutant equivalence is undecidable [4], this has motivated some research into how the problem can be circumvented [11]. For example, let S o (I) and S m (I) denote the respective outputs of S o and S m for a given input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%