“…In order to capture 90% of the CO 2 , in the gas mixture into its liquid form, the process consumes about 0.395 MJ per kg of CO 2 with a resulting CO 2 purity of over 99% [13] . The advantages of cryogenic CO 2 capture techniques, as readily recognizable from the above examples, are: (1) the energy penalty of solvent regeneration and generated pressure drop can be neglected [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] ; (2) CO 2 can be captured in the liquid or solid phase, enabling compression without the huge energy consumption associated with gaseous compression, and providing a convenient means for storage and transport [4][5][6] ; (3) the compression, expansion and refrigeration technologies in the cryogenic CO 2 capture system are all relatively mature industrial processes, and can be easily utilized on an industrial-scale [10,13] ; (4) various refrigeration byproducts will be produced in some systems, such as high purity N 2 , and these can reduce the operation cost of the plant [14] . Nevertheless, to extract CO 2 from the other components in the flue gas (typically as N 2 , CO 2 , H 2 O, NO x , SO x ), a very low-temperature is required, resulting in the following problems [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] : (1) a large amount of energy is consumed for the refrigeration, leading to a high energy penalty for capture, and the process covers a large range of operating conditions from normal to supercritical states; (2) in the anti-sublimation processes, CO 2 will be frozen on the cold surfaces of the flow channels or heat exchangers, potentially causing several operational problems, such as plugging; (3) for the pre-combustion power plant and the oxy-fuel power plant, a large amount of additional energy is consumed in the hydrogen production or air separation unit; (4) acidic gas, such as NO x , SO x , may damage the devices, and shorten their operational life time.…”