2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2004.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two opposite effects of cofilin on the thermal unfolding of F-actin: a differential scanning calorimetric study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 Because boundaries between cofilin-bound and unbound actin subunits occur with a higher frequency at low binding densities than at high binding densities, local changes (i.e. boundaries) in the mechanical properties will be more prominent at binding densities where cofilin binds noncontiguously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Because boundaries between cofilin-bound and unbound actin subunits occur with a higher frequency at low binding densities than at high binding densities, local changes (i.e. boundaries) in the mechanical properties will be more prominent at binding densities where cofilin binds noncontiguously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cofilin destabilizes F-actin via a shift in the mean twist of actin filaments [McGough et al, 1997;Galkin et al, 2001] and cooperative changes in longitudinal and lateral interprotomer contacts [McGough and Chiu, 1999;Galkin et al, 2001;McGough et al, 2001;Bobkov et al, 2002;Galkin et al, 2003;Bobkov et al, 2004]. Cooperative effects of cofilin on F-actin are evident also from the presence of "tilted" filament structure in segments free of cofilin [Galkin et al, 2002], differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements [Dedova et al, 2004;Bobkov et al, 2006], and phosphorescence decay (anisotropy) studies with Cys 374 -labeled actin [Prochniewicz et al, 2005].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of the length over which cofilininduced conformational changes and cooperative binding interactions propagate along actin vary, ranging from N = 1-2 up to N > 100 subunits (3,5,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Equilibrium (3,6,12,21) and transient kinetic (12,14) binding data are well described by models invoking positive cooperativity between nearest neighbors (N = 1-2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equilibrium (3,6,12,21) and transient kinetic (12,14) binding data are well described by models invoking positive cooperativity between nearest neighbors (N = 1-2). In contrast, differential scanning calorimetric (13) and spectroscopic lifetime (15) measurements estimate allosteric propagation of changes in structure, stability, and/or dynamics over N > 100 subunits. More recently, a singlemolecule TIRF study measured positive cooperative binding interactions that propagated exponentially with a decay length of N ~24 subunits (18), and atomic force microscopic imaging directly observed a change in the crossover distance of N ~14 bare actin subunits towards the pointed-end side of the boundary, but no propagation in the bare actin subunits towards the barbedend side of the boundary (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%