2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-parameter characterization of elastic–plastic crack front fields: Surface cracked plates under uniaxial and biaxial bending

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The critical challenge on quantifying the stress field of crack tip in those welded components is that the crack tip field can be influenced by many factors such as material mismatch (Kumar et al 2014), weldment geometry (Zhou et al 2014), residual stress (Ren et al 2009) and loading state, e.g., biaxial loading (Wang 2012;Shlyannikov et al 2011;Shlyannikov et al 2014;Wang et al 2014). Those factors can lead to the variations of microstructure (Kulkarni et al 2020), stress level (Han et al 2015), fracture toughness (Hemer et al 2020) as well as crack growth rate (Krishnan et al 2018;Alves et al 2020;Velu 2018) for the weldment, among which fracture toughness is an crucial fracture parameter to be determined as it can affect the border of failure assessment diagram which has been widely used as the evaluation tool by the industrial field (Dai et al 2020a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The critical challenge on quantifying the stress field of crack tip in those welded components is that the crack tip field can be influenced by many factors such as material mismatch (Kumar et al 2014), weldment geometry (Zhou et al 2014), residual stress (Ren et al 2009) and loading state, e.g., biaxial loading (Wang 2012;Shlyannikov et al 2011;Shlyannikov et al 2014;Wang et al 2014). Those factors can lead to the variations of microstructure (Kulkarni et al 2020), stress level (Han et al 2015), fracture toughness (Hemer et al 2020) as well as crack growth rate (Krishnan et al 2018;Alves et al 2020;Velu 2018) for the weldment, among which fracture toughness is an crucial fracture parameter to be determined as it can affect the border of failure assessment diagram which has been widely used as the evaluation tool by the industrial field (Dai et al 2020a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The further discussion on creep crack growth prediction considering stress triaxility is presented by Alang and Nikbin (2018). A discussion on the biaxial loading for surface crack was given by Wang (2012), where the solutions were analyzed based on the constraint parameter Q in elastoplastic solids. Also for elastoplastic solids, investigations of biaxial effect on the crack tip field as well as crack growth are presented by coauthors (2011, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And based on the T-stress solutions, the Q factor solutions for cracked plates under tensile and bending loads have been obtained. 49,50 In a recent work of authors, 51 the elastic-plastic constraint parameter A d was applied to predict the fracture toughness of single-edge-notched-bend (SEN[B]) test specimens. And based on the parameter A d , a load independent unified constraint parameter A d * 52,53 has been investigated and developed using the cracked plates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, not only the load and geometry effects of in-plane but also those from out-of-plane need to be considered in the fracture mechanics analysis of 3D crack structures (see Refs. [25][26][27][28][29]. In addition, structural components generally experience multiaxial stress state under practical loading conditions, which in the presence of a crack may result in mixed-mode fracture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%