2001
DOI: 10.1117/12.445628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-part study toward lowest uncertainty calibration of ceramic gauge blocks: interferometry and mechanical comparison techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for avoiding calibration of gauge blocks dissimilar materials lies in differences of their temperature extension and mechanical effects. Bigger calibration laboratories avoid the need for calibrating gauge blocks of dissimilar materials by acquiring additional reference set of tungsten carbide and/or ceramics, which is then interferometric calibrated (Decker et al, 2001). Unfortunately small laboratories have too small a customer base in these materials to justify the expense of additional reference sets (Mudronja et al, 2004).…”
Section: Mechanical Calibration Of Gauge Blocks Of Dissimilar Materiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for avoiding calibration of gauge blocks dissimilar materials lies in differences of their temperature extension and mechanical effects. Bigger calibration laboratories avoid the need for calibrating gauge blocks of dissimilar materials by acquiring additional reference set of tungsten carbide and/or ceramics, which is then interferometric calibrated (Decker et al, 2001). Unfortunately small laboratories have too small a customer base in these materials to justify the expense of additional reference sets (Mudronja et al, 2004).…”
Section: Mechanical Calibration Of Gauge Blocks Of Dissimilar Materiamentioning
confidence: 99%