“…Studies argue that 'ideal' supervisors are attentive to candidates' requests for help (Åkerlind & McAlpine, 2017), adaptable and flexible, especially for part-time candidates or in cases where candidates' circumstances or study plans change, and are able and willing to offer constructive feedback that enables candidates to learn the discourses of the discipline through their writing, reading, and thinking work (Kumar & Stracke, 2007;Stracke & Kumar, 2020). Additionally, supervisors are called on to be attentive to candidates' mental and emotional wellbeing, referring candidates for professional assistance as needed and generally being kind and accommodating where needed (Määttä & Uusiautti, 2015;Strandler, et al, 2014). This research points to the need for supervisors to 'see' their candidates in the sense of recognising them as whole people with full lives that include but are not solely focused on their doctorate.…”