2009
DOI: 10.1121/1.3177262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two perspectives on equipartition in diffuse elastic fields in three dimensions

Abstract: The elastodynamic Green function can be retrieved from the cross correlations of the motions of a diffuse field. To extract the exact Green function, perfect diffuseness of the illuminating field is required. However, the diffuseness of a field relies on the equipartition of energy, which is usually described in terms of the distribution of wave intensity in direction and polarization. In a full three dimensional (3D) elastic space, the transverse and longitudinal waves have energy densities in fixed proportio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we find for all sites that the scaling coefficient for only the vertical component is 15-30 per cent lower compared to the horizontal scaling coefficient, probably due to the more heterogeneous vertical composition. From a theoretical point a view, this might indicate equal energies for the transverse and longitudinal waves with the independent modes of vibration in a full 3-D space (Perton et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we find for all sites that the scaling coefficient for only the vertical component is 15-30 per cent lower compared to the horizontal scaling coefficient, probably due to the more heterogeneous vertical composition. From a theoretical point a view, this might indicate equal energies for the transverse and longitudinal waves with the independent modes of vibration in a full 3-D space (Perton et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-terms disappear when the noise sources are uncorrelated; hence, a single crosscorrelation of noise observations at x A and x B gives, analogous to equation 7, ͕G͑x B ,x A ,t͒ ‫ם‬ G͑x B ,x A ,‫מ‬t͖͒ ‫ء‬ S N ͑t͒, where S N ͑t͒ is the autocorrelation of the noise ͑see Figure 6f͒. Note that the symmetry of the responses in Figure 6e and f relies again on the isotropic illumination of the receivers, i.e., on the net power flux of the illuminating wavefield being ͑close to͒ zero ͑van Tiggelen, 2003; Malcolm et al, 2004;Sánchez-Sesma et al, 2006;Snieder et al, 2007;Perton et al, 2009;Weaver et al, 2009;Yao et al, 2009͒. Of course, what is demonstrated here for a 2D distribution of sources also holds for a 3D source distribution. In that case, all sources in Fresnel volumes rather than Fresnel zones contribute to the retrieval of the direct wave between x A and x B .…”
Section: Tutorial On Interferometry: Part 1 75a199mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weaver (1985) studied diffuse fields at the free surface of half-space and found the contributions of P, SV, SH and Rayleigh waves to surface energy densities. Sánchez-Sesma et al (2008) and Perton et al (2009) also included the free surface to have a half-space in 2D and 3D, respectively, and studied the transition between deep space and the free surface. In fact, the energy density per unit area associated with Rayleigh waves is: Perton et al (2009) computed the energy densities against depth in an elastic half-space.…”
Section: Energy Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, equipartition means that the available energy in the phase space goes with equal average amounts, to all the possible states. Extending the results by Weaver (1982, 1985) Sánchez-Sesma et al (2008 and Perton et al (2009) pointed out that in addition to modes the equipartition allows description with degrees of freedom. These two aspects of equipartition lead to the interpretation of microtremor H/V spectral ratios or MHVSR in terms of the imaginary part of Green's functions (Sánchez-Sesma et al 2011b) using diffuse field assumption (DFA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%