2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2007.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-phase flow modelling of a solar concentrator applied as ammonia vapor generator in an absorption refrigerator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental values are previewed along with their associated error bars. A good agreement to within ±10% occurs between our numerical results and the experimental ones all over the plotted range, better than the numerical model used by Santos-Gonzá lez et al and discussed by Ortega et al [16].…”
Section: Validationsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental values are previewed along with their associated error bars. A good agreement to within ±10% occurs between our numerical results and the experimental ones all over the plotted range, better than the numerical model used by Santos-Gonzá lez et al and discussed by Ortega et al [16].…”
Section: Validationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…where is the Stefan-Boltzmann, the effective emmissivity between the absorber and the cover is [8] , / = ̅ 1− 2̅ (16) Similarly the radiation exchange between the absorber and the reflector, and between the reflector and the cover, respectively are…”
Section: Thermal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial conditions introduced in the numerical model were the geometry of the CPC, the boundary conditions, the location (latitude and longitude), date and time of the test. With this information, the model can predict the increment of temperature between the inlet and outlet of the CPC, the energy gain by the transport fluid, efficiency and pressure drop as well as other flow variables, along the system [7].…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the main disadvantage of the above proposed systems is the thermal loss due to the indirect coupling between the solar array and the refrigeration cycle, in addition to the higher initial investment imposed by the increasing number of the components. Ortega et al [6] included a compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) coupled directly with a single effect solar absorption system with a capacity of 3.8 kW, in order to reduce the thermal losses and the number of the components. The reported system has a theoretical CPC efficiency of 0.46 and a COP in the cycle of 0.45 that results in a global efficiency of 0.21.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%