2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2022.109644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-phase flow pattern identification in horizontal gas–liquid swirling pipe flow by machine learning method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning models are established based on training data and are not influenced by physical constraints. The flow pattern of the gas–liquid two-phase was mainly identified by visualization research in the past, but it could not accurately capture the subtle variation in the flow pattern. , In recent years, machine learning methods have been introduced into the flow pattern identification of the gas–liquid two-phase, which could provide a reference for the advancement of flow pattern recognition technology. , The approximation solutions and higher flow pattern recognition accuracy can be obtained by using ML mechanisms for flow pattern recognition without simulation or a training data set. , Figure depicts the confusion matrix of the flow pattern recognition results using SVM and RF. There are 128 working conditions in the experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Machine learning models are established based on training data and are not influenced by physical constraints. The flow pattern of the gas–liquid two-phase was mainly identified by visualization research in the past, but it could not accurately capture the subtle variation in the flow pattern. , In recent years, machine learning methods have been introduced into the flow pattern identification of the gas–liquid two-phase, which could provide a reference for the advancement of flow pattern recognition technology. , The approximation solutions and higher flow pattern recognition accuracy can be obtained by using ML mechanisms for flow pattern recognition without simulation or a training data set. , Figure depicts the confusion matrix of the flow pattern recognition results using SVM and RF. There are 128 working conditions in the experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…82,83 In recent years, machine learning methods have been introduced into the flow pattern identification of the gas−liquid two-phase, which could provide a reference for the advancement of flow pattern recognition technology. 84,85 The approximation solutions and higher flow pattern recognition accuracy can be obtained by using ML mechanisms for flow pattern recognition without simulation or a training data set. 86,87 pattern for the data labels in Figure 17.…”
Section: R/s Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal performance coefficient was improved as 6%, until reaches the highest value with (Re =30000 and φ = 4%). Sowi et al [63] analyzed numerically and experimentally a innovates twisted tape inserted having linear increasing and decreasing of (PR)pitch ratio for three different types of nanofluid (SiC, Al2O3 and CuO) at Re (4000 -16,000) and φ = 1% to 3% by using ANSYS FLUENT with RNG K-ε turbulent model and used five geometries of TT, (TT PR 2), (TT LIPR 0,2), (TT LIPR 0.25), (TT LIPR 0.3) and (TT LDPR 0.25) are used for analysis. The using of (φ =1% of SiC) nanofluid with (TT has LIPR 0.25) simultaneously with Re=10000 raised overall enhancement ratio to 2.985.…”
Section: -2-1-1 Single Phase Flow With Twisted Tape Insertmentioning
confidence: 99%