2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.89.023007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two phenomenological constants explain similarity laws in stably stratified turbulence

Abstract: In stably stratified turbulent flows, the mixing efficiency associated with eddy diffusivity for heat, or equivalently the turbulent Prandtl number (Pr(t)), is fraught with complex dynamics originating from the scalewise interplay between shear generation of turbulence and its dissipation by density gradients. A large corpus of data and numerical simulations agree on a near-universal relation between Pr(t) and the Richardson number (R(i)), which encodes the relative importance of buoyancy dissipation to mechan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
103
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
17
103
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach has also been used to explain macroscopic relations between the turbulent Prandtl number, Monin-Obukhov stability parameter, and Richardson number in the stratified ASL. [19][20][21] The modeled MVP in KM14 matches experimental observations well in the logarithmic region (see also Ref. 22) and the viscous sublayer, where turbulent stresses are small.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 66%
“…This approach has also been used to explain macroscopic relations between the turbulent Prandtl number, Monin-Obukhov stability parameter, and Richardson number in the stratified ASL. [19][20][21] The modeled MVP in KM14 matches experimental observations well in the logarithmic region (see also Ref. 22) and the viscous sublayer, where turbulent stresses are small.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 66%
“…With a higher Reynolds number (Re f = 600), the surface Richardson number Ri 0,0 where this intermittent behaviour in TKE is seen increases to around 0.005, while for Ri 0,0 = 0.010 the flow laminarizes almost completely. At Re f = 900, the flow remains fully and steadily turbulent up to Ri 0,0 = 0.005; therefore, the hypothesized increase in the critical Richardson number with increasing Reynolds number (Schlichting 1979;Katul et al 2014) is further supported by these findings.…”
Section: Physical Parameterssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…For example, some studies (see Canuto 2002, and references therein) indicate that Ri c may be as large as one or beyond, and some argue that a critical limit does not exist at all (Monin & Yaglom 1975;Yamamoto 1975;Lettau 1979;Galperin, Sukoriansky & Anderson 2007). Other arguments suggest that laminarization would happen when the characteristic length of the large eddies (estimated as the Obukhov scale in Flores & Riley (2011) and the Ozmidov scale in Katul et al (2014)), which is reduced by buoyancy, approaches some multiple of the Kolmogorov scale, the ratio of the two scales effectively becoming proportional to Re 3/4 . Chung & Matheou (2012) also argue in their analysis of stationary homogeneous stratified turbulence that the Richardson number is not sufficient to determine the state of the flow; a measure of the scale separation (given by the Reynolds number) is also needed.…”
Section: Profiles Of the Gradient Richardson Number Tke And Stressmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, in the University of Washington moist turbulence scheme in CAM5 [ Bretherton and Park , ; Park and Bretherton , ], which is a turbulent kinetic energy closure scheme, uses the moist gradient Richardson number to diagnose the vertical extent and stability characteristics of all turbulent layers in a model grid column. Flux Richardson number is often used in observational and theoretical studies [ Yamada , ; Grachev et al , ; Katul et al , ]. It is particularly pointed out that the “ critical bulk Richardson number” used in our study is different from the “ critical gradient Richardson number” often associated with the Miles‐Howard theory on the stability of laminar boundary layers whose value is about 0.25 [ Miles , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%