2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8cp01699b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two photon spectroscopy and microscopy of the fluorescent flavoprotein, iLOV

Abstract: LOV-domains are ubiquitous photosensory proteins that are commonly re-engineered to serve as powerful and versatile fluorescent proteins and optogenetic tools. The photoactive, flavin chromophore, however, is excited using short wavelengths of light in the blue and UV regions, which have limited penetration into biological samples and can cause photodamage. Here, we have used non-linear spectroscopy and microscopy of the fluorescent protein, iLOV, to reveal that functional variants of LOV can be activated to g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the larger the lifetime of the donor protein, the higher the sensitivity of the FRET‐based biosensor. The fluorescence lifetimes of several FbFPs were reported and generally ranged from >3 to 6 ns . For comparison, GFP‐based fluorescent proteins rarely have lifetimes that are >4 ns .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the larger the lifetime of the donor protein, the higher the sensitivity of the FRET‐based biosensor. The fluorescence lifetimes of several FbFPs were reported and generally ranged from >3 to 6 ns . For comparison, GFP‐based fluorescent proteins rarely have lifetimes that are >4 ns .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, GFP‐based fluorescent proteins rarely have lifetimes that are >4 ns . Here, we used time‐correlated single‐photon counting to measure an average fluorescence lifetime for CreiLOV of 4.50±0.09 ns (Figure A, B), which is a little shorter than iLOV (5.27 ns), but longer than photostable iLOV (phiLOV2.1, 3.36 ns) and free FMN (4.38 ns) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, while glutamate uncaging experiments require the removal of extracellular Mg 2+ or depolarization of neurons to release Mg 2+ from NMDARs 2 , paCaMKII can be activated in physiological conditions such as the mouse brain in vivo. Third, the wavelength window of MNI-glutamate uncaging is up to 800 nm 2 , while that of paCaMKII is up to~980 nm (i.e., FMN absorption) 32 . Because a longer wavelength has a superior penetration depth, this is advantageous for sLTP induction in deep tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because a longer wavelength has a superior penetration depth, this is advantageous for sLTP induction in deep tissues. Fourth, since the two-photon cross section of LOV2 (0.5-0.9 GM in 800-900 nm) 32 is higher than that of MNI-glutamate (0.06 GM at 720 nm, the most widely used wavelength for efficient photolysis) 58,59 , weaker laser power (i.e., lower cell toxicity) can be used for sLTP induction. Together, these advantages facilitate the manipulation of synaptic plasticity under physiological conditions with low phototoxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation