1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.53.16283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-photon spectroscopy study of ZnS and CdS under hydrostatic pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
9
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we neglect the effect of pressure on the exciton binding energy we can deduce the bangap pressure coefficients of c-CdS and h-CdS films to be, respectively, 41 and 42 meV/GPa at low temperature. These values are in fair agreement with the bandgap pressure coefficient of 45 meV/GPa in bulk and undoped h-CdS at room temperature [9,12] and with the pressure coefficient of 46.2 meV/GPa for the A-exciton in h-CdS at low temperature [11]. In addition to the PL spectra we can determine the energy of the excitons from the position of the resonance peak in the Raman intensity in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If we neglect the effect of pressure on the exciton binding energy we can deduce the bangap pressure coefficients of c-CdS and h-CdS films to be, respectively, 41 and 42 meV/GPa at low temperature. These values are in fair agreement with the bandgap pressure coefficient of 45 meV/GPa in bulk and undoped h-CdS at room temperature [9,12] and with the pressure coefficient of 46.2 meV/GPa for the A-exciton in h-CdS at low temperature [11]. In addition to the PL spectra we can determine the energy of the excitons from the position of the resonance peak in the Raman intensity in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The estimated accuracy of the experimental pressure coefficient is about 1 meV/GPa. These pressure coefficients are smaller by about 10% than the pressure coefficient of 46.2 meV/GPa determined in the A exciton of bulk h-CdS at low temperature by Mang et al [11]. If the CdS films were to be "clamped" by the GaAs substrate we expect that the thin film pressure coefficient would be smaller than that of the bulk sample by about 23% from the difference in their bulk moduli.…”
Section: Experimental Details and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2.The fundamental band gap of the system is direct, Γ v 15 → Γ c 1 , in agreement with experiment15 . As expected, the HF result, 10.96 eV, strongly overestimates the actual experimental value of 3.83eV80 . The average energy position E d of the d band complex atFIG.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…FIG.1:(Color online) Relative errors of the calculated (in GGA) band gaps of selected semiconductors/insulators. Experimental data have been taken from the Refs [17][18][19]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%