2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.77.014003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-pion exchange contribution to proton-proton scattering at medium energies

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We utilize a dipole form for the pion-nucleon form factor ∼1=ð1 þ Q 2 =m 2 A Þ 2 , where m A ∼ 1 GeV is the axial mass [72,73], and similarly the proton electromagnetic form factor F 1 ðQ 2 Þ ∼ 1=ð1 þ Q 2 =ð0.71 GeVÞ 2 Þ 2 . The contribution from one-pion exchange is significant in a narrow energy range, and it is known that additional processes, such as twopion exchange, become important for beam momenta above 600-700 MeV [74,75]. Retaining just the one-pion exchange contribution will nonetheless be sufficient in our case, as we are interested in the ratio of two-to three-body final states, in which the overall normalization of the pp cross section drops out as for the splitting function calculation above.…”
Section: One-pion Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We utilize a dipole form for the pion-nucleon form factor ∼1=ð1 þ Q 2 =m 2 A Þ 2 , where m A ∼ 1 GeV is the axial mass [72,73], and similarly the proton electromagnetic form factor F 1 ðQ 2 Þ ∼ 1=ð1 þ Q 2 =ð0.71 GeVÞ 2 Þ 2 . The contribution from one-pion exchange is significant in a narrow energy range, and it is known that additional processes, such as twopion exchange, become important for beam momenta above 600-700 MeV [74,75]. Retaining just the one-pion exchange contribution will nonetheless be sufficient in our case, as we are interested in the ratio of two-to three-body final states, in which the overall normalization of the pp cross section drops out as for the splitting function calculation above.…”
Section: One-pion Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is the analogue of (3.52), both already discussed in Sec. 2 Note that Gibbs and Loiseau [110] introduced a similar set of amplitudes, but following Ref. [5], they used unit vectors { , m } which are rotated by 45 • as compared to our { , m} for the scattered particle, so that their amplitudes are the same (a = a, etc.…”
Section: This Implies the Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Note that Gibbs and Loiseau [110] introduced a similar set of amplitudes, but following Ref. [5], they used unit vectors { , m } which are rotated by 45…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%