2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2016.05.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two point discrimination in lower limbs in healthy people: Average values and influence of gender, dominance, height and BMI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that smaller distances were not tested as 32 output channels were considered as hardware limitations of the used stimulation system and we envisioned a multi‐array electrode with at least three or more rows of pads around the thigh that will allow the spatial representation of 3D information from robotic limbs. The obtained results are in line with the previously reported values of electrotactile (9.88 mm 34 ) and mechanical (ranging from 23.2 ± 9.3 mm 35 to 31.5 ± 12.6 mm 36 ) two‐point discrimination threshold (TPDT).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It should be noted that smaller distances were not tested as 32 output channels were considered as hardware limitations of the used stimulation system and we envisioned a multi‐array electrode with at least three or more rows of pads around the thigh that will allow the spatial representation of 3D information from robotic limbs. The obtained results are in line with the previously reported values of electrotactile (9.88 mm 34 ) and mechanical (ranging from 23.2 ± 9.3 mm 35 to 31.5 ± 12.6 mm 36 ) two‐point discrimination threshold (TPDT).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%