2004 Workshop on High Performance Switching and Routing, 2004. HPSR.
DOI: 10.1109/hpsr.2004.1303433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two priority buffered multistage interconnection networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, when all the traffic on a six-stage SiLMIN inputs is unicast-type, then the normalized throughput which is estimated by both our methods ( Figure 5: AM-w = 0% and SM-w = 0% curves) is in close agreement with the corresponding results shown by Shabtai and colleagues in Figure 13 of their paper [7], when their six-stage MINs work with single priority.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, when all the traffic on a six-stage SiLMIN inputs is unicast-type, then the normalized throughput which is estimated by both our methods ( Figure 5: AM-w = 0% and SM-w = 0% curves) is in close agreement with the corresponding results shown by Shabtai and colleagues in Figure 13 of their paper [7], when their six-stage MINs work with single priority.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…video or voice delivery traffic) than non realtime traffic (such as file transfer traffic). Such QoS strategies have been proposed and studied in [4][5][6][7]. Another method to meet QoS requirements is to use MINs that support multicast traffic for servicing a lot of data in a fast manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the case of single-priority traffic p = 1, we noticed that all simulation experiments were in close agreement with the results reported in [19] ( Figure 2 in [19]), and-notably-with Theimer et al's model [10], which is considered to be the most accurate one. For p = 2 (dual-priority MINs) we compared our measurements against those obtained from Shabtai et al's model reported in [13], and have found that both results are in close agreement (maximum difference was only 3.8%).…”
Section: Simulator Validationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Recently, Shabtai et al [7] presented a study of MIN performance evaluation operating with priorities, by developing an analytical model using Markovian approaching. The same topic is also analyzed by Nasser et al [13] using different approaches.…”
Section: Prior Research Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We begin our study on MIN taxonomy by referring to the presentation of Hing Tse [1]. A general review was then undertaken by studying some typical examples of analytical techniques [2][3][4][5][6][7]26] which were also applied to single-layer MINs. This was necessary because there are no relevant studies concerning MLMINs.…”
Section: Prior Research Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%