2017
DOI: 10.1515/dema-2017-0025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two properties of Müntz spaces

Abstract: Abstract:We show that Müntz spaces, as subspaces of C [ , ], contain asymptotically isometric copies of c and that their dual spaces are octahedral.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our initial motivation for doing this, was the known fact that such spaces X are isomorphic, even almost isometrically isomorphic in the case X = M 0 (Λ), to subspaces of c (see [17] and [16]). Based on this, the results from [3], and other results from [16] one could expect similar results for Müntz spaces as for c. And, indeed, this is the case, at least for X = M 0 (Λ) (see Theorem 3.13). In this class of Müntz spaces the ∆-and Daugavet-points are the same and the Daugavet-points are exactly the functions f ∈ S X for which f (1) = ±1.…”
Section: ∆And Daugavet-points For Different Classes Of Spacessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Our initial motivation for doing this, was the known fact that such spaces X are isomorphic, even almost isometrically isomorphic in the case X = M 0 (Λ), to subspaces of c (see [17] and [16]). Based on this, the results from [3], and other results from [16] one could expect similar results for Müntz spaces as for c. And, indeed, this is the case, at least for X = M 0 (Λ) (see Theorem 3.13). In this class of Müntz spaces the ∆-and Daugavet-points are the same and the Daugavet-points are exactly the functions f ∈ S X for which f (1) = ±1.…”
Section: ∆And Daugavet-points For Different Classes Of Spacessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…(a) Lindenstrauss spaces (this follows by inspecting the proof of Proposition 4.6 in [4]); (b) uniform algebras (see Theorem 4.2 in [3]); (c) ASQ-spaces, in particular, Banach spaces which are M-ideals in their bidual (see [1]); (d) Banach spaces with an infinite-dimensional centralizer (this follows by inspecting the proof of Proposition 3.3 in [6]); (e) somewhat regular linear subspaces of C 0 (L), whenever L is an infinite locally compact Hausdorff topological space [5]; (f) Müntz spaces (this follows by inspecting the proof of Theorem 2.5 in [2]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%