2007
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.106.108829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Protein Trafficking Processes at Motor Nerve Endings Unveiled by Botulinum Neurotoxin E

Abstract: The unique ability of a family of botulinum neurotoxins to block neuroexocytosis specifically-by selective interaction with peripheral cholinergic nerve endings, endocytotic uptake, translocation to the cytosol, and enzymic cleavage of essential proteins-underlies their increasing therapeutic applications. Although clinical use of type A is most widespread due to its prolonged inactivation of the synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa, botulinum neurotoxin E cleaves this same target but at a different bond … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that the relationships between concentration and paralysis time for BoNT/E and BoNT/C were fit well by a power function ( Fig. 1E; Table 1), a property well established for the action of BoNTs at the neuromuscular junction (Simpson, 1980;Lawrence et al, 2007). Although BoNT/A showed more variation, the data could also be fitted with a power function (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is noteworthy that the relationships between concentration and paralysis time for BoNT/E and BoNT/C were fit well by a power function ( Fig. 1E; Table 1), a property well established for the action of BoNTs at the neuromuscular junction (Simpson, 1980;Lawrence et al, 2007). Although BoNT/A showed more variation, the data could also be fitted with a power function (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Because of limitations in the amounts of BoNTs available, a large static bath was used, as done previously by us (Lawrence et al, 2007) and others (Simpson, 1980) to study the action of these proteins on innervated skeletal muscle. This recording format gives a lower efficiency of EFS for nerve (and muscle) because of reduced shunt resistance; hence, the pulse frequencies and widths required to elicit muscle contractions (see figure legends for details) are larger than those reported in studies using smaller baths (e.g., MacKenzie et al, 1982).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muscle contractions were elicited by electrical stimulation (50-ms square pulses of 5-10 V at 0.2 Hz) of the nerve and measured using FORT25 isometric force transducers (World Precision Instruments) as described previously (18). BoNTs were added directly to the Krebs-Ringer buffer, and the time taken for a 90% reduction in muscle tension was recorded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, neuromuscular paralysis induced by BoNT A can be reversed by elevating [Ca 2ϩ ] i but not in the case of BoNT E treatment (13)(14)(15). Although BoNT E blocks neurotransmission more quickly and more potently than BoNT A (16), the clinical applications of BoNT E are restricted by its neuromuscular paralytic action being transient: less than 4 weeks in contrast to more than 4 months for BoNT A (17,18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%