2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10444-017-9549-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two scale Hardy space infinite elements for scalar waveguide problems

Abstract: We consider the numerical solution of the Helmholtz equation in domains with one infinite cylindrical waveguide. Such problems exhibit wavenumbers on different scales in the vicinity of cut-off frequencies. This leads to performance issues for non-modal methods like the perfectly matched layer or the Hardy space infinite element method. To improve the latter, we propose a two scale Hardy space infinite element method which can be optimized for wavenumbers on two different scales. It is a tensor product Galerki… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In its standard form, this pole condition is equivalent to the radiation condition underlying the complex scaling, which is equivalent to the radiation condition of Sec. 2.1 for certain domains of complex frequencies including positive frequencies (see [16] or more explicitly for waveguides in [14,11]).…”
Section: Comparison To the Hardy Space Infinite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its standard form, this pole condition is equivalent to the radiation condition underlying the complex scaling, which is equivalent to the radiation condition of Sec. 2.1 for certain domains of complex frequencies including positive frequencies (see [16] or more explicitly for waveguides in [14,11]).…”
Section: Comparison To the Hardy Space Infinite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These drawbacks of CS/PML methods gave rise to the development of novel alternative methods such as the two-pole Hardy space infinite element method [22,21,23] and the halfspace matching method [10,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%