2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2022.123154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two stable phenyl acyl thiourea carboxylate-based MOFs: Syntheses, crystal structures and proton conductive properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 100 °C, the conductivities span by 2–3 orders of magnitude from low temperature to high temperature and reach the highest values of 5.09 × 10 –3 S·cm –1 for 1 and 3.41 × 10 –3 S·cm –1 for 2 , which are well comparable to the reported complexes using N -heterocyclic carboxylic acid ligands as building blocks (Table ). As stated in Table , although the optimal σ values of these two compounds are lower than that of some carboxylic acid-based materials, ,, they still exceed the proton conductivity of most carboxylic acid-based MOFs and are still in the ranks of high-proton-conductivity materials. , The σ values of 1 and 2 are also excellent compared to those of similar compounds constructed by the zwitterionic ligands in the literature. , This evinces the structural superiority of such compounds in terms of proton conductivity, which is the advantage of the ligands adopted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…At 100 °C, the conductivities span by 2–3 orders of magnitude from low temperature to high temperature and reach the highest values of 5.09 × 10 –3 S·cm –1 for 1 and 3.41 × 10 –3 S·cm –1 for 2 , which are well comparable to the reported complexes using N -heterocyclic carboxylic acid ligands as building blocks (Table ). As stated in Table , although the optimal σ values of these two compounds are lower than that of some carboxylic acid-based materials, ,, they still exceed the proton conductivity of most carboxylic acid-based MOFs and are still in the ranks of high-proton-conductivity materials. , The σ values of 1 and 2 are also excellent compared to those of similar compounds constructed by the zwitterionic ligands in the literature. , This evinces the structural superiority of such compounds in terms of proton conductivity, which is the advantage of the ligands adopted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Analogous observations have been reported in other vanadoborates or MOFs-based proton-conducting materials. 23,40,41 Even though the proton conductivity of 8.82 × 10 −4 S cm −1 is not too high, but it is comparable with that of many well-studied MOFs-based proton conductive materials, such as Ni-MOFs/PAN ( σ = 6.049 × 10 −5 S cm −1 at 363 K 90% RH), 42 [Cd(p-TIPhH 2 IDC) 2 (H 2 O)] n ( σ = 1.24 × 10 −4 S cm −1 at 373 K 98% RH), 43 Mn(H 2 BBT) 2 (H 2 O) 2 ] n ( σ = 1.69 × 10 −5 S cm −1 at 373 K 98% RH), 44 etc. XRD patterns of 1 were also recorded after humidity- and temperature-dependent tests for confirming its structural integrity, in which the main peaks match well with the simulated one, suggesting that our compound could maintain its framework stability during the proton conduction (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, ionothermal synthesis [ 65 ], the solvent evaporation method [ 66 ], and the post-synthetic modification method [ 67 ] are also commonly employed in the synthesis, structural modulation, and performance improvement of MOFs.…”
Section: Synthesis Characterization and Performance Evaluation Of Mof...mentioning
confidence: 99%