2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-stage cooperation model with input freely distributed among the stages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many real applications, DMUs may contain several production processes before achieving final outputs (Kao and Hwang, 2008;Zha and Liang, 2010;Zhou et al, 2013;Liu and Lu, 2012;Halkos et al, 2014;Aviles-Sacoto et al, 2015). Recently, Lozano and Villa (2010) estimated the potential merger gains of two DMUs with parallel structures and found that a hypothetical DMU combined by two DMUs could potentially have cost savings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many real applications, DMUs may contain several production processes before achieving final outputs (Kao and Hwang, 2008;Zha and Liang, 2010;Zhou et al, 2013;Liu and Lu, 2012;Halkos et al, 2014;Aviles-Sacoto et al, 2015). Recently, Lozano and Villa (2010) estimated the potential merger gains of two DMUs with parallel structures and found that a hypothetical DMU combined by two DMUs could potentially have cost savings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the overall efficiency is evaluated in a cooperative manner. In the same context, Zha and Liang (2010) introduce a two-stage DEA model with shared inputs to be allocated among the two stages (see also Sect. 15.5).…”
Section: Game Theoretic Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, following Kao and Hwang (2008), the authors propose, under both VRS and CRS, an approach to find a set of multipliers that maximize either the first or the second stage efficiency score while maintaining the overall efficiency score. Zha and Liang (2010) analyze the two-stage network process with shared inputs as in Fig. 15.5.…”
Section: Two-stage Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a survey by Cook et al [10], they pointed out that the approaches of modeling DMUs with a twostage production process can be categorized as four types, i.e., standard DEA methodology, efficiency decomposition methodology, network DEA, and game-theoretic approaches. The standard DEA methodology simply uses the standard DEA model, i.e., two separate DEA models to calculate the efficiencies of two stages (e.g., Seiford and Zhu [9]; Zhu [11]; and Sexton and Lewis [12]); the efficiency decomposition methodology is that given the efficiency scores of stage 1 and stage 2, the overall efficiency could be defined as the product or the arithmetic mean of two substages' efficiencies (e.g., Kao and Hwang [13]; Chen et al [14], and Chen et al [15]); the network DEA approach extends the two-stage process to more general situation (e.g., Tone and Tsutsui [16]; Tone and Tsutsui [17]; Izadikhah et al [18]); game-theoretic approaches introduce game theory to the efficiency evaluation of twostage structure (e.g., Liang et al [19]; Zha and Liang [20]; Li et al [21]; Guo and Zhu [22]; and Izadikhah et al [18]). Except for the standard DEA approach, all other approaches attempt to correct for the above-referenced conflict issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%