Two-Stage Efficiency Structure Analysis Model of Shipbuilding Based on Driving Factors: The Case of Chinese Shipyard

Xue, Lei; Shi, Guofu; Dashuang, Dai; Xu, Yizhuang

doi:10.4236/jss.2020.82015

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The problem of complex products in the "main manufacturer-supplier" model has been studied by many scholars, focusing on two aspects: First, the research is carried out from the perspective of contract design based on game theory. Based on the evolutionary game, Xue et al [ 17 , 18 ] proposed a dynamic penalty mechanism that is more conducive to complex product quality control from the perspective of contract design, and designed a contractual game model of quality improvement incentive gain-sharing contracts between the main manufacturers and suppliers of large ships, taking into account supply chain synergy factors. Liu and Wu [ 19 ] designed a class of quality incentive contracts for complex product supply chains by considering the effects of short-term economic benefits and long-term quality reputation, and by constructing a "benefit-reputation" utility function for quality cooperators in the supply chain to achieve a win-win situation in terms of their overall utility.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Joint duration-cost-quality optimization model for complex product supply chains under contingency conditions

Li,

Dong,

2023

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique (GERT) and complex networks are used to simulate and analyse complex product supply chain networks based on the characteristics of complex product supply chain networks. And the traditional GERT is improved by constructing a grey parametric GERT network with restricted output results, taking into account the fact that the duration, product quality and product cost of each supplier in a complex product supply chain are interval values rather than definite values, and that customers have restrictions on the duration, product quality and product cost of the final product. The functional relationship between product quality, product cost and duration is analysed, and two satisfaction functions for duration and cost are constructed in order to quantify the multi-objective requirements of shortening duration, saving product cost and guaranteeing product quality for complex products under emergency situations. Then, a duration-cost-quality model for complex product supply chains in contingency situations is constructed to obtain the better duration, product cost and product quality of each supplier by optimising the indicator parameters in the network. Finally, the scientific validity and effectiveness of the model and method are verified by means of arithmetic example. The results show that the method is able to analyse the optimal duration, product quality and product cost of each supplier, and the main manufacturer can obtain an optimised combination of duration, cost and quality for a complex product supply chain in different contingency situation. To further promote the sustainable and secure development of complex product supply chains, this paper also suggests the integration of data sharing and blockchain technology with complex product supply chains to develop dynamic supply chain feedback management systems.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Joint duration-cost-quality optimization model for complex product supply chains under contingency conditions

Li,

Dong,

2023

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Li, Zhang, and Liu (2017) [6] used stochastic frontier analysis to calculate the technical efficiency of the shipbuilding industry, and then further analyzed the regional development differences as well as the influencing factors of technical efficiency. Xue et al (2020) [20] constructed a two-stage internal production efficiency structure analysis model (ESAM) to analyze the efficiency of the internal operation, process, and management of Chinese shipyards.…”

Section: The Marine Ship Industry Chainmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficiency Decomposition Analysis of the Marine Ship Industry Chain Based on Three-Stage Super-Efficiency SBM Model—Evidence from Chinese A-Share-Listed Companies

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on the micro-data of 79 listed companies in the Chinese marine ship industry chain from 2015 to 2019, this paper calculates the comprehensive technical efficiency (TE), pure technical efficiency (PTE), and scale efficiency (SE) of the upstream, midstream, and downstream of China’s marine ship industry chain by using a three-stage super-efficiency slacks-based model (SBM), and further analyzes the weak links in industrial chain efficiency and their influencing factors. It is shown that (i) the TE and PTE of the upstream, midstream, and downstream of China’s marine ship industry chain are in a “V”-shaped distribution, high at both ends and low in the middle, but that the SE is ranked as follows: upstream > midstream > downstream. In addition, the PTE is the main factor which hinders the improvement of TE in the industrial chain. (ii) The environmental variables have significant impacts on industrial chain efficiency. When the influences of environmental variables and random error terms are excluded, the industrial chain efficiency changes significantly. The values of SE and TE decrease significantly, and the distribution characteristic of TE changes. However, the PTE is still in a “V”-shaped distribution and appears to be the main driving force for the progress of TE. (iii) China’s marine ship industry chain has obvious weak links in terms of efficiency, and the midstream and downstream areas need to focus on development. Each link of the industry chain has high coupling and low coordination, and they are all closely related to each other, but the coordination ability is insufficient. The industrial chain in terms of efficiency and coordinated development can still be improved.

show abstract

“…They observed that rules based on combinations of the time criticality index, resource criticality index and shortest processing time yield the most and the least efficient trade-off, respectively, between time and resource-oriented objectives. Xue et al (2020) indicated that building technique, resource ability and management level are the three major drivers of the production efficiency of shipbuilding. Based on an empirical study on one of the largest state-owned shipbuilding companies in China, they suggested that improving management Productivity of major shipyards efficiency and technique efficiency should be the main direction taken to improve Chinese shipbuilding efficiency.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing the productivity of major shipyards in China, South Korea, and Japan – an application of a metafrontier framework

Chao

Yeh

2020

MABR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to measure the productivity of 21 major shipyards in China, South Korea and Japan. Design/methodology/approach Data envelopment analysis was applied to measure the productivity of shipyards. The contemporaneous and intertemporal productivity scores of each shipyard were measured. Additionally, the technical gaps among shipyards in China, South Korea and Japan were measured and compared. Findings The results indicate that Japan led the global shipbuilding industry in 2014 and South Korea dominated in 2015. Additionally, from 2014 to 2015, shipyards in South Korea and Japan maintained their levels of productivity. Comparatively, major shipyards in China made substantial progress from 2014 to 2015, revealing their strong ambition to improve productivity. Originality/value This study first used a metafrontier framework to measure the technical gap of shipyards among major shipbuilding countries. The model and approach objectively analyze the productivity of major shipyards and considers their nationalities. Additionally, this study is the first to measure changes in the productivity of shipyards. By decomposing the metafrontier Malmquist productivity index, major shipyards were categorized into eight sets. The results of this study can provide a clear direction for shipyards to improve their productivity.

show abstract

Two-Stage Efficiency Structure Analysis Model of Shipbuilding Based on Driving Factors: The Case of Chinese Shipyard

Cited by 6 publications

References 15 publications

Joint duration-cost-quality optimization model for complex product supply chains under contingency conditions

Joint duration-cost-quality optimization model for complex product supply chains under contingency conditions

Efficiency Decomposition Analysis of the Marine Ship Industry Chain Based on Three-Stage Super-Efficiency SBM Model—Evidence from Chinese A-Share-Listed Companies

Comparing the productivity of major shipyards in China, South Korea, and Japan – an application of a metafrontier framework

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About