2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-stage evaluation of the impact of a nursing information system in Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the hospital sector, several theoretically based models of HIS success (with success defined from the user's perspective) provide empirical support that specific elements can predict successful systems. 7,[28][29][30][31][32] In a recent study, 33 reviews the electronic health information system (EHIS) models, identifying 21 health and 5 nonhealth models.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the hospital sector, several theoretically based models of HIS success (with success defined from the user's perspective) provide empirical support that specific elements can predict successful systems. 7,[28][29][30][31][32] In a recent study, 33 reviews the electronic health information system (EHIS) models, identifying 21 health and 5 nonhealth models.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adoption studies at typical inpatient settings indicate nurses were satisfied with EHR functionality (33)(34)(35)(36) and were dissatisfied with access to (33,37) and quality of (38,39) patient information in the EHR, and the EHR's impact on their efficiency (33). Our results show clinicians were dissatisfied with EHR functionality, and EHR impact on accessibility and quality of patient information and their efficiency, providing an alternative perspective.…”
Section: Ehr Implementation Considerations For Pace Decision Makersmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Complex user-interface and navigation mechanism, slow response, poor content design (Darbyshire, 2004;Kossman, 2006;Lee et al, 2008;Stevenson et al, 2010;Vatnøy et al, 2014;Weinhara et al, 2009;Whittaker et al, 2009). Moderate ease of use (Weinhara et al, 2009;Whittaker et al, 2009).…”
Section: Themes Summary Of Findings Usability Ease Of Use / Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low satisfactory / dissatisfaction (Darbyshire, 2004;Laerum et al, 2004;Mills et al, 2013;Stevenson et al, 2010;Tilahun & Fritz, 2015). Dynamics of nurses' experience: During the period of implementation, nurses' attitude and satisfaction increased overtime as they experienced more with the system (Ammenwerth et al, 2011;Carayon et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2008). Fidelity HIS functionality did not meet the nurses' needs nor support their workflows and practice (Novak et al, 2013;Stevenson et al, 2010); workflow interruptions, additional work (Eley et al, 2009;Lee et al, 2008), unintended consequences (Dowding et al, 2009;Koppel et al, 2005).…”
Section: Usefulness / Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation