2013
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2013.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-stage microbial community experimental design

Abstract: Microbial community samples can be efficiently surveyed in high throughput by sequencing markers such as the 16S ribosomal RNA gene. Often, a collection of samples is then selected for subsequent metagenomic, metabolomic or other follow-up. Two-stage study design has long been used in ecology but has not yet been studied in-depth for high-throughput microbial community investigations. To avoid ad hoc sample selection, we developed and validated several purposive sample selection methods for two-stage studies (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Staged study designs are particularly appropriate for the microbiome (Tickle et al, 2013), as they allow the benefits of large cross-sectional profiles combined with molecular detail derived from a subset of individuals, conditions, or time points.…”
Section: Gaps Challenges and Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Staged study designs are particularly appropriate for the microbiome (Tickle et al, 2013), as they allow the benefits of large cross-sectional profiles combined with molecular detail derived from a subset of individuals, conditions, or time points.…”
Section: Gaps Challenges and Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“Bottom up” molecular detail can be added efficiently by perturbation studies in cell lines, but these are limited in relatability to primary populations. Two-stage study designs offer cost-effective scalability to larger cohorts (Tickle et al, 2013), which are also better powered for genetic profiling. Patient samples can be used to derive primary cell lines (Miyoshi and Stappenbeck, 2013) or organoids (Sato et al, 2011) for controlled perturbations that more closely recapitulate in vivo conditions.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20] For these reasons, it is crucial to have properly powered cohorts and ad hoc longitudinal study designs. [21][22][23][24] Propionibacterium acnes and S. epidermidis are two prevalent members of the skin microbiome, but many other bacteria from the Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria phyla are frequently found. [3,23] The micro-eukaryotic component of the microbiome also comprises many organisms (most notably Malassezia spp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining the lower cost and decreased resolution of amplicon sequencing with the higher cost and increased resolution of WMS sequencing (here, one “unit” of WMS sequencing and four “units” of amplicon sequencing are considered to have equivalent costs) enables richer experimental designs. For example, two-stage study designs begin by surveying a large number of individuals using amplicon sequencing and then follow-up with a subset of samples using WMS sequencing (selected based on individuals that are representative of the group or those that represent the extreme cases within the group 119 ). Similarly, time course studies can combine amplicon sequencing, which is used to survey a large number of time points, with WMS sequencing, which is applied to analyze a subset of time points (such as the first and last) in greater detail.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%