2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-stage stochastic model updating method for highway bridges based on long-gauge strain sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, numerical and experimental studies showed that TL enables BMU to recognize injury severity despite modeling errors. Chen et al [140] proposed a two-stage method for bridge FEMU. The proposed method combined a radial basis function (RBF) neural network and Bayesian theory.…”
Section: Bayesian Methods-based Femumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, numerical and experimental studies showed that TL enables BMU to recognize injury severity despite modeling errors. Chen et al [140] proposed a two-stage method for bridge FEMU. The proposed method combined a radial basis function (RBF) neural network and Bayesian theory.…”
Section: Bayesian Methods-based Femumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and fast Bayesian FFT Steel truss bridge [138] Transfer learning is used to bridge the bias Numerical and experimental models [139] Radial basis function Numerical and experimental models [140] Nonlinear Model…”
Section: Gaussian Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data is helpful in validating the natural frequencies and mode shapes of a bridge for various Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) purposes. The vibration data (such as acceleration) can be used together with static responses of the bridge (such as stress, strain, or displacement) to update a FE model through deterministic or stochastic methods (Chen et al 2022). A common way to validate an FE model without carrying out a complex model updating process is to identify and calibrate modal parameters of a bridge using e.g., modal identification methods and altering structural properties such as Young's modulus, material densities, boundary conditions, members or FE elements constraints/fixities through a rigorous sensitivity-based approach until the FE model represents the actual structure with a good approximation (Ghiasi et al 2022a(Ghiasi et al , 2022b.…”
Section: Nosing Load Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surrogate models commonly used in structural finite element model updating mainly include the polynomial response surface model [15][16][17], radial basis function (RBF) model [18,19], Kriging model [20], and neural network model [21][22][23][24][25]. Xu [26] proposed a bridge structure finite element model updating method based on the sparrow search algorithm (SSA) and the polynomial response surface method, and by updating the model of the high-dimensional locally damaged cantilever beam, the feasibility of the proposed method was verified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%