1974
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1974.00320140050005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Stage Tricuspid Valve Replacement for Mixed Bacterial Endocarditis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(362)(363)(364)(365)(366) In the first stage, the tricuspid valve is removed while appropriate antibiotic therapy is continued. The prosthesis is then inserted at a later time when all evidence of infection has been eliminated.…”
Section: Antibiotic Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(362)(363)(364)(365)(366) In the first stage, the tricuspid valve is removed while appropriate antibiotic therapy is continued. The prosthesis is then inserted at a later time when all evidence of infection has been eliminated.…”
Section: Antibiotic Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two reports of excision with later replacement of the tricuspid valve in addicts (Simberkoff et al, 1974;Arneborn et al, 1977). In these two cases the second operation was carried out at eight and at 12 weeks respectively, and in both cases a metallic prosthesis was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, a superinfection may have occurred when the patient may have been giving herself injections. A 'mixed' infection with Gram-negative bacteria in addition to staphylococci (Simberkoff et al, 1974) may have developed. The favourable effect of gentamicin and carbenicillin supports this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good results have been obtained in many cases of tricuspid valve endocarditis by means of valve resection alone (Arbulu et al, 1973;Graham et al, 1973, Michl et al, 1973 or with the insertion of an artificial valve at a second operation (Arbulu et al, 1973;Simberkoff et al, 1974).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%