2022
DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2022.2065488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-step deep learning approach for pavement crack damage detection and segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we introduce the attention mechanism: the attention mechanism suppresses interference and enhances crack identi cation accuracy. Jiang et al [13] introduced CBAM (Convolutional Block Attention Module) to improve segmentation accuracy; Zhou et al [2] combined channel attention and spatial attention modules to improve the effectiveness of crack feature extraction. We lter the seam linear information by introducing BRA for low-level feature selection at the end of the encoder to enhance the model's immunity to seam linear.…”
Section: Improvement Of Unet Architecture To Enhance Crack Detection ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, we introduce the attention mechanism: the attention mechanism suppresses interference and enhances crack identi cation accuracy. Jiang et al [13] introduced CBAM (Convolutional Block Attention Module) to improve segmentation accuracy; Zhou et al [2] combined channel attention and spatial attention modules to improve the effectiveness of crack feature extraction. We lter the seam linear information by introducing BRA for low-level feature selection at the end of the encoder to enhance the model's immunity to seam linear.…”
Section: Improvement Of Unet Architecture To Enhance Crack Detection ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [14] replaced the traditional convolution with DSC in UNet, but when dealing with complex and channel-associated segmentation of cracks in the tunnel lining, it may lead to poor segmentation results due to ignoring the cross-channel correlation. Jiang et al [13] applied the Ghost module in DeepLabv3 + to reduce the number of native features by generating "Ghost" features, which improves the e ciency but may sacri ce the richness and diversity of some features. The decoder in this study cascades the DSC and Ghost modules into a DDG module, which draws on the strengths of each to complement each other and enhance the adaptation to cracks at different scales.…”
Section: Improvement Of Unet Architecture To Enhance Crack Detection ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Jiang et al [14] proposed a method based on deep learning called DDSNet, combines optimized YOLOv4 and deeplabv3+ models for two-stage pavement crack detection and segmentation. They stated that the accuracy is improved by 2.23% and 7.47%, respectively, and the inference speed is increased by 35.3% and 50.3%, respectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we evaluate the performance of the proposed model. For comprehensive comparison, we select CNN models including FCN [10], U-Net [12] GhostNet [13], MobileNetv3 [41], and DeepLabv3+ [42] Transformer models including ViT [15], Segmenter [16], Swin Transformer [43], SETR [17], DeiT [44], as well as two-stage models, such as ALSNet [45], TSUNet [46], DDNet [47], APCNet [48], CMMANet [49], and PCDNet [50] as benchmark methods. For the GhostNet and ViT models, we preserve their encoding parts and replace the original classification head with a 1 × 1 convolution.…”
Section: Comparisons With the State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%