2015
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m115.678086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-step Ligand Binding in a (βα)8 Barrel Enzyme

Abstract: Background: HisA catalyzes a ring-opening isomerization reaction in histidine biosynthesis. Results: Catalytic residues and conformational changes upon substrate binding are clarified by structures, kinetics, and mutagenesis. Conclusion: Closing of active site loops in HisA brings the substrate into a product-like conformation before catalysis. Significance: This exemplifies coupled conformational changes in a (␤␣) 8 barrel enzyme and its substrate and clarifies the mechanistic cycle of HisA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Figure 4 , the most common mutations were located in or near the active site. For example, mutations in positions 80, 81, 83, and 102, which interact with the phosphate adjoining the non-reacting ribose (phosphate 2) of ProFAR ( Söderholm et al, 2015 ) were common, as were mutations in the nearby positions 79, 106, and 107. Without structures and enzyme kinetic data of the different mutant proteins it is challenging to explain how they can confer their effect but some observations can be made.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen in Figure 4 , the most common mutations were located in or near the active site. For example, mutations in positions 80, 81, 83, and 102, which interact with the phosphate adjoining the non-reacting ribose (phosphate 2) of ProFAR ( Söderholm et al, 2015 ) were common, as were mutations in the nearby positions 79, 106, and 107. Without structures and enzyme kinetic data of the different mutant proteins it is challenging to explain how they can confer their effect but some observations can be made.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the phosphate 2 binding site ( Figures 4C,D ) is likely to be important for proper positioning of the native substrate ProFAR, and mutations in nearby positions could alter the phosphate binding site to allow PRA binding ( Newton et al, 2017 ). Purified wt HisA coordinates PO 4 2– or SO 4 2– in both phosphate binding sites ( Söderholm et al, 2015 ), and the presence of a negatively charged ion in this site causes electrostatic repulsion of the negatively charged PRA, thus preventing binding of PRA and TrpF activity. Mutations affecting the phosphate 2 binding site and reducing the binding of PO 4 2– and SO 4 2– would likely increase binding of PRA, improving TrpF activity with a collateral loss of HisA activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tuberculosis (mtPriA), the catalytic efficiencies of tmHisA, ddHisA, and pcHisA are about tenfold higher ( Table 1 , HisA reaction). They are comparable to the catalytic efficiency of HisA from Salmonella enterica (seHisA), which is considered to be an archetypical representative of the HisA family [ 12 ]. Strikingly, tmHisA, ddHisA, and pcHisA also displayed TrpF-activity, something that has not been shown before.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the exact reasons for this discrepancy are unknown, it may be due to differences in enzyme purification and handling. 4 Data taken from [ 12 ]; n. d.: values were not determined. 5 n. d.: k cat and could not be determined individually; was deduced from the linear part of the saturation curve.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all mutation effect predictors that required a crystal structure to be used, the structure of Salmonella enterica HisA(D7N, D176A) with ProFAR (PDB ID: 5A5W ( Söderholm et al. 2015 )) was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%