2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00603-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Structures of Cyclophilin 40

Abstract: The X-ray structures are consistent with the role of Cyclophilin 40 as a multifunctional signaling protein involved in a variety of protein-protein interactions. The intermolecular helix-helix interactions in the tetragonal form mimic the intramolecular interactions found in the fully folded monoclinic form. These conserved intra- and intermolecular TPR-TPR interactions are illustrative of a high-fidelity recognition mechanism. The two structures also open up the possibility that partially folded forms of TPR … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each single unit consists of two consecutive ␣-helices containing 12-15 residues (except ␣1 and ␣3, containing 21 and 23 residues, respectively) that cross at an angle of Ϸ20°to each other. The organizational pattern of the FKBP52 TPR domain is similar to those of FKBP51, Cyp40, PP5, and Hop (8,16,25,26). There is an additional ␣-helix (␣7) in the C terminus beyond the final TPR motif that contains the calmodulin-binding site (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each single unit consists of two consecutive ␣-helices containing 12-15 residues (except ␣1 and ␣3, containing 21 and 23 residues, respectively) that cross at an angle of Ϸ20°to each other. The organizational pattern of the FKBP52 TPR domain is similar to those of FKBP51, Cyp40, PP5, and Hop (8,16,25,26). There is an additional ␣-helix (␣7) in the C terminus beyond the final TPR motif that contains the calmodulin-binding site (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In the unit cell, the pocket of molecule A faces the pocket of molecule B, and there is enough space for the peptides to fill in, but the binding pocket of molecule C is blocked by the FK2 domain of another molecule C, which explains why this molecule does not bind the peptide. Previous mutation analysis and crystal structures of TPR domains have identified residues in Hop, Cyp40, and PP5 that are essential for Hsp90 binding (8,25,26,29,30). Comparing these proteins with FKBP52, the key residues for binding Hsp90 are conserved, which suggests a functional similarity between these proteins.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The TPR domain of FKBP51 has three repeats of the TPR motif and is structurally very similar to the Hsp90-binding domains of PP5 (36), Hop (37), and Cyp40 (38). At 21 and 25 residues, respectively, ␣1 and ␣3 are longer than the usual 12-15 residues, but ␣2 and ␣4-␣6 are within the average size for TPR helices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of the Hop TPR domains (37) shows binding in an antiparallel orientation to ␣1, ␣3, ␣5, and ␣7, which form the groove for both Hsp70 and Hsp90 fragments. The report of the Cyp40 structure (38) does not have an Hsp90 fragment bound, but instead uses the crystal packing to model Hsp90 binding, which results in a binding parallel, not antiparallel, to the direction of the helices lining the binding groove. The structure of the FKBP51 TPR domain gives no indication of the binding orientation of Hsp90.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, apart from serving mere anchoring functions, TPR domains of the chaperone cofactors Hip and p60/Hop also exert regulatory functions on the ATPase activities of Hsp70 and Hsp90, respectively (11,12). The conserved architecture of the TPR fold is well established based on a number of x-ray structures of different TPR domains (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). Each 34-amino acid motif forms a pair of antiparallel ␣-helices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%