2020
DOI: 10.3389/fspas.2020.00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two Successive Type II Radio Bursts Associated With B-Class Flares and Slow CMEs

Abstract: From 2018 Oct 12 to 13, three successive solar eruptions (E1-E3) with B-class flares and poor white light coronal mass ejections (CMEs) occurred from the same active region NOAA AR 12724. Interestingly, the first two eruptions are associated with Type II radio bursts but the third is not. Using the soft X-ray flux data, radio dynamic spectra and dual perspective EUV intensity images, we comparatively investigate the three events. Our results show that their relevant flares are weak (B2.1, B7.9, and B2.3) and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings show that the type II radio burst is associated with a blowout jet that does not evolve into a CME. The starting frequency of the radio bursts is in the range of 200-250 MHz, which is larger than those of CME-driven type II radio bursts found in many previous studies (e.g., Cho et al 2007Cho et al , 2008Feng et al 2013;Chen et al 2014;Ma & Chen 2020;Jebaraj et al 2021;Ramesh et al 2023). This could be the difference between jet-driven type II radio bursts and CME-driven type II radio bursts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings show that the type II radio burst is associated with a blowout jet that does not evolve into a CME. The starting frequency of the radio bursts is in the range of 200-250 MHz, which is larger than those of CME-driven type II radio bursts found in many previous studies (e.g., Cho et al 2007Cho et al , 2008Feng et al 2013;Chen et al 2014;Ma & Chen 2020;Jebaraj et al 2021;Ramesh et al 2023). This could be the difference between jet-driven type II radio bursts and CME-driven type II radio bursts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Based on their findings, they proposed that the band-splitting signals are moderately polarized with left-handed polarized emission stronger than the right-hand one. It is commonly believed that coronal shocks result from the coronal mass ejection (CME) propagation or expansion (e.g., Cliver et al 2004;Vršnak & Cliver 2008;Liu et al 2009;Chen 2011;Li et al 2012;Shen & Liu 2012;Cho et al 2013;Feng et al 2013;Chen et al 2014;Ying et al 2018;Ma & Chen 2020;Lu et al 2022;Zhang et al 2022b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Vršnak, 2019] studied the pre-eruptive gradual rise of flux ropes with an analytical model, considering three different driving processes. [Ma and Chen, 2020] investigated two Type II radio bursts associated with three slow CMEs. [Mishra et al, 2020] made an effort to extrapolate the internal thermodynamic properties of a CME flux rope near the Sun to 1 AU by using a model constrained by the CME kinematics.…”
Section: Editorial On the Research Topicmentioning
confidence: 99%