1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00196078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two sulphur isotope provinces deduced from ores in the Mount Isa Eastern Succession, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An oxidized magmatie sulfur soume was discounted on the basis that the sulfur isotope range (-7 to +4.0%0) was not large enough and was suggested to be more consistent with a reduced hydrothermal system. Davidson (1989) and Davidson and Dixon (1992) interpreted other possible sulfur sources at Starra to be leached biogenie sedimentary sulfur; inorganically reduced seawater sulfate; and thermally degraded organic sulfur (as organic earbon was believed to have been contributed to the Starra earbonares during volcanic exhalation). This final point is questioned, as the calcite at Starra was deposited late in the paragenesis (post-metamorphic, post-ironstone formation) from very oxidized fluid.…”
Section: Origin Of the Starra Ironstones And Mineralizationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An oxidized magmatie sulfur soume was discounted on the basis that the sulfur isotope range (-7 to +4.0%0) was not large enough and was suggested to be more consistent with a reduced hydrothermal system. Davidson (1989) and Davidson and Dixon (1992) interpreted other possible sulfur sources at Starra to be leached biogenie sedimentary sulfur; inorganically reduced seawater sulfate; and thermally degraded organic sulfur (as organic earbon was believed to have been contributed to the Starra earbonares during volcanic exhalation). This final point is questioned, as the calcite at Starra was deposited late in the paragenesis (post-metamorphic, post-ironstone formation) from very oxidized fluid.…”
Section: Origin Of the Starra Ironstones And Mineralizationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Inorganically reduced seawater sulfate is also disputed, due to the large, positive isotopic range (-5 to +20%0) that is not consistent with isotopic signatures of Starra sulfides, and the significantly depleted 834S sulfate values (1.1-2.4%o; see below), which compare to 20 per mil for Proterozoie seawater-derived anhydrite (Ohmoto, 1986). The Starra sulfur must have had a significantly different isotopic composition to sulfur that Davidson and Dixon (1992) interpreted to be derived from metasedimentary host rocks at two nearby localities (Answer mine: 834Spyrite 8.4-9.1%o; Mount Cobalt: 834Spyrite 4.2-4.9%0). 8a4S in Starra bornitc, chalcocite, and anhydrite falls within the pyrite-chalcopyrite 8a4S range and supports a single sulfur source.…”
Section: Origin Of the Starra Ironstones And Mineralizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data represent pyrite and the full range of base metal sulfi des present, as well as disseminated sulfi des within the host sediments. References and location information are as follows: Aberfeldy, Scotland (Willan and Coleman, 1983); Balmat-Edwards, United States (Whelan et al, 1984); Jianshengpan, Dongshengmiao, and Tanyaokou, China (Ding and Jiang, 2000); Sullivan, Canada (Campbell et al, 1978(Campbell et al, , 1980; Belt Supergroup, United States (Lyons et al, 2000;Luepke and Lyons, 2001); Amjhore, India (Guha, 1971;Pandalai et al, 1991); McArthur River, Australia (Smith and Croxford, 1975;Rye and Williams, 1981;Eldridge et al, 1993;Shen et al, 2002); Mount Isa, Australia (Solomon, 1965;Smith et al, 1978;Andrew et al, 1989;Davidson and Dixon, 1992;Painter et al, 1999;McShane, 1996); Dugald River, Australia (Dixon and Davidson, 1996;Davidson and Dixon, 1992); Lady Loretta, Australia, (Carr and Smith, 1977;Scott et al, 1985). With the exception of the Chinese deposits, the histograms are stacked in a generally correct stratigraphic order.…”
Section: Implications Stratigraphic Isotope Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light sulphur signatures δ 34 S values (>−3‰) are found in sulphide from Dubarpeth that probably reflect the relatively high oxidation state of the ore stage and magmatic in origin. However, δ 34 S value (−10.85‰) observed in one chalcopyrite grain could also imply other sulphur sources besides the magmatic one (Davidson & Dixon, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%