2021
DOI: 10.11591/ijeecs.v23.i2.pp639-649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-terminal fault detection and location for hybrid transmission circuit

Abstract: This paper presents the algorithms developed to detect and locate the faults ata hybrid circuit. First, the fault detection algorithm was developed using the comparison of total positive-sequence fault current between pre-fault and fault times to detect the occurrence of a fault. Then, the voltage check method was used to decide whether the fault occurred at overhead line (OHL) or cable section. Finally, the fault location algorithm using the impedance-based method and negative-sequence measurements from both … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the authors mention that this may not be the case if applied using other interference location methods. While the paper Idris et al [12] has also examined the location of interference by using data from two different terms to detect interference in the transmission system. Awalin et al [13] focuses on how to detect the types of disturbances that occur in electrical power distribution systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the authors mention that this may not be the case if applied using other interference location methods. While the paper Idris et al [12] has also examined the location of interference by using data from two different terms to detect interference in the transmission system. Awalin et al [13] focuses on how to detect the types of disturbances that occur in electrical power distribution systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the lowest value of each figure may be compared again to make it simpler to draw conclusions in choosing the optimum placement for PMUs. The following equation compares the three lowest values from Figures 5 to 7: PMU 1 (0.0093) < PMU 23 (0.0095) < PMU 30 (0.0097)(12). According to the comparison of the lowest MSE value based on equation 12, the least value of the overall MSE calculation is PMU 1of 0.0093.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional fault locations use the impedance [2]- [6] and travelling wave [7]- [9] methods. In impedance-based methods, the distance of the fault location is proportional to the impedance between the fault point and measurement terminal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%