The Flory–Huggins (FH) isotherm first appeared
in the literature
of water contaminant adsorption in the mid-2000s. It has come into
the limelight and received considerable attention in recent years,
in large part due to regular coverage in review articles. Here, we
point out that a linear form of the FH isotherm is incompatible with
the original nonlinear version. We show conclusively that the original
FH isotherm was destroyed beyond recognition by the linearization
method. As a result, the linearized FH isotherm suffers from the following
serious defects: (1) Its parameter estimates are incorrect and nonsensical.
(2) It is not possible to plot standard isotherm curves in the form
of adsorbed phase concentration versus liquid phase concentration.
These anomalies, or “red flags”, that arise in the use
of the linearized FH isotherm in data correlation are reported for
the first time. To avoid publishing meaningless research, it is advisable
to use the original form of the FH isotherm in data fitting. To go
beyond routine application (e.g., simple data correlation and thermodynamic
calculation), this work describes a novel application that uses the
FH isotherm to evaluate the energy distribution of heterogeneous adsorbents.