2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-thumb technique is superior to two-finger technique during lone rescuer infant manikin CPR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
34
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…157 Two techniques have been described: compression with 2 thumbs with the fingers encircling the chest and supporting the back (the 2-thumb technique) or compression with 2 fingers with a second hand supporting the back (the 2-finger technique). Because the 2-thumb technique generates higher blood pressure and coronary perfusion pressure with less rescuer fatigue, the 2 thumb-encircling hands technique is suggested as the preferred method [158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171][172] (Class IIb, LOE C-LD). Because the 2-thumb technique can be continued from the head of the bed while the umbilicus is accessed for insertion of an umbilical catheter, the 2-finger technique is no longer needed.…”
Section: Chest Compressions Nrp 605 Nrp 895 Nrp 738 Nrp 862mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…157 Two techniques have been described: compression with 2 thumbs with the fingers encircling the chest and supporting the back (the 2-thumb technique) or compression with 2 fingers with a second hand supporting the back (the 2-finger technique). Because the 2-thumb technique generates higher blood pressure and coronary perfusion pressure with less rescuer fatigue, the 2 thumb-encircling hands technique is suggested as the preferred method [158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171][172] (Class IIb, LOE C-LD). Because the 2-thumb technique can be continued from the head of the bed while the umbilicus is accessed for insertion of an umbilical catheter, the 2-finger technique is no longer needed.…”
Section: Chest Compressions Nrp 605 Nrp 895 Nrp 738 Nrp 862mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the critical outcome of improved perfusion and gas exchange during CPR, we identified low-quality evidence from 9 randomized controlled trials (downgraded for indirectness and imprecision) [182][183][184][185][186][187][188][189][190] and 6 nonrandomized controlled trials (downgraded for indirectness, imprecision, and high risk of bias) [191][192][193][194][195][196] identifying higher blood pressure generation with the 2-thumb versus the 2-finger method.…”
Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…157 Two techniques have been described: compression with 2 thumbs with the fingers encircling the chest and supporting the back (the 2-thumb technique) or compression with 2 fingers with a second hand supporting the back (the 2-finger technique). Because the 2-thumb technique generates higher blood pressure and coronary perfusion pressure with less rescuer fatigue, the 2 thumb-encircling hands technique is suggested as the preferred method [158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171][172] (Class IIb, LOE C-LD). Because the 2-thumb technique can be continued from the head of the bed while the umbilicus is accessed for insertion of an umbilical catheter, the 2-finger technique is no longer needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%