2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-019-9604-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two types of hyperthermal events in the Mesozoic-Cenozoic: Environmental impacts, biotic effects, and driving mechanisms

Abstract: A deeper understanding of hyperthermal events in the Earth's history can provide an important scientific basis for understanding and coping with global warming in the Anthropocene. Two types of hyperthermal events are classified based on the characteristics of the carbon isotope excursion (CIE) of the five representative hyperthermal events in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. The first type is overall characterized by negative CIEs (NCHE) and represented by the Permian-Triassic boundary event (PTB,~252 Ma), the earl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 167 publications
(229 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Marine sediment ÎŽ 18 O, palaeothermometer TEX 86 , and other palaeoclimatic proxies indicate that the overall temperatures remained relatively high values and may have triggered global OAEs during the mid‐Cretaceous (Ando, Kaiho, Kawahata, & Kakegawa, 2008; Bottini et al, 2015; Bottini, Cohen, Erba, Jenkyns, & Coe, 2012; Hochuli et al, 1999; Keller et al, 2011; Mutterlose, Bottini, Schouten, & Sinninghe DamstĂ©, 2014; Mutterlose, Malkoc, Schouten, Sinninghe DamstĂ©, & Forster, 2010; Zhang, Ji, Du, Dai, & Hou, 2015). Of these, two hothouse regimes, coupling with OAEs are outstanding in the Cretaceous (Hu, Li, Han, & Li, 2020). The first hothouse regime, coupling with the OAE (termed as the OAE 1a, also the Selli event) occurred in Early Aptian (~120 Ma), which has resulted in an increase of 5–6°C and 2–4°C in surface seawater temperature in low‐ and moderate‐latitudes, respectively (Littler et al, 2011; Mutterlose et al, 2010; Mutterlose et al, 2014; Naafs & Pancost, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marine sediment ÎŽ 18 O, palaeothermometer TEX 86 , and other palaeoclimatic proxies indicate that the overall temperatures remained relatively high values and may have triggered global OAEs during the mid‐Cretaceous (Ando, Kaiho, Kawahata, & Kakegawa, 2008; Bottini et al, 2015; Bottini, Cohen, Erba, Jenkyns, & Coe, 2012; Hochuli et al, 1999; Keller et al, 2011; Mutterlose, Bottini, Schouten, & Sinninghe DamstĂ©, 2014; Mutterlose, Malkoc, Schouten, Sinninghe DamstĂ©, & Forster, 2010; Zhang, Ji, Du, Dai, & Hou, 2015). Of these, two hothouse regimes, coupling with OAEs are outstanding in the Cretaceous (Hu, Li, Han, & Li, 2020). The first hothouse regime, coupling with the OAE (termed as the OAE 1a, also the Selli event) occurred in Early Aptian (~120 Ma), which has resulted in an increase of 5–6°C and 2–4°C in surface seawater temperature in low‐ and moderate‐latitudes, respectively (Littler et al, 2011; Mutterlose et al, 2010; Mutterlose et al, 2014; Naafs & Pancost, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although changes in p CO 2 during the early Cenozoic warming events (foremost, the PETM) were larger in magnitude and more rapid than carbon (C) perturbations of Quaternary glacial–interglacial transitions ( 11 , 12 ), they occurred under a background greenhouse climate state characterized by high baseline atmospheric p CO 2 (∌1,000 ppm). Other periods of pre-Cenozoic C perturbations ( 13 , 14 ), such as the Cretaceous and Jurassic (Toarcian) ocean anoxic events (OAEs) ( 15 , 16 ), and the end-Triassic ( 17 ) and the end-Permian mass extinction events ( 18 ), also occurred during background greenhouse climates ( 19 , 20 ). These greenhouse OAEs have provided constraints on and insights into how to model climate change and marine redox evolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the p CO 2 record drops back to pre‐OAE values during Ap6 and Ap7 (Heimhofer et al., 2004; Naafs et al., 2016; Figure 6). Although the top of Ap6 is generally considered as the end of OAE 1a, the Ap7 segment records a gradual return to pre‐OAE conditions, and has been considered as the “recovery stage” (Hu et al., 2020), affected by protracted environmental perturbations (Castro et al., 2019). The upper part of Ap7 segment records the highest C‐isotope values of the core, which mark the end of the positive plateau, and the initiation of a decreasing trend that characterizes the base of the upper Aptian.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%