2013
DOI: 10.7557/12.2503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two types of parasitic assimilation

Abstract: <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:OfficeDocumentSettings> <o:AllowPNG /> </o:OfficeDocumentSettings> </xml><![endif]--> <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves /> <w:TrackFormatting /> <w:PunctuationKerning /> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas /> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedConte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some analyses, a transparent vowel undergoes harmony, but then problematic feature combinations are ‘repaired’, or interpreted at the surface level (e.g. Clements 1977, Finley 2008, Jurgec 2011). Under other analyses, they are skipped (Pulleyblank 1996, Nevins 2010, Kimper 2011), with different methods of addressing the issue of ‘strict’ segmental locality.…”
Section: Possible Analyses Of Short Central /ə/: One Vowel or Two?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some analyses, a transparent vowel undergoes harmony, but then problematic feature combinations are ‘repaired’, or interpreted at the surface level (e.g. Clements 1977, Finley 2008, Jurgec 2011). Under other analyses, they are skipped (Pulleyblank 1996, Nevins 2010, Kimper 2011), with different methods of addressing the issue of ‘strict’ segmental locality.…”
Section: Possible Analyses Of Short Central /ə/: One Vowel or Two?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this might appear to be a morphological condition, we suggest here that it instead illustrates a positional licensing effect: schwa is possible only in prominent positions, including not only roots (as seen above), but also final syllables. While initial syllables are typically associated with prominence (Beckman 1997, 1998), word-final positions have also been independently argued to be associated with enhanced faithfulness (Barnes 2006, Jurgec 2011). There is independent evidence for this in Slovenian: the contrast between the two low tense vowels [ʌ] and [a] is limited to word-final closed syllables.…”
Section: Multiple Interactions: Slovenianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper focuses on a subset of such morphologically derived environment effects (MDEEs) that present particular challenges for existing accounts of morphophonological interaction because they involve long-distance interactions between affixation and root-internal segments. In Dutch, for example, some speakers produce [ɹ] in recent English loanwords, but the native segment [ʀ] in derived words (Jurgec 2011: §3.4.2, 2014).
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most analyses of labial harmony have converged on two separate generalisations. First, labial harmony is parasitic, in that its application depends on the agreement of some other feature(s), in many cases, vowel height (Ultan 1973: 55, Steriade 1981, Cole & Trigo 1988, van der Hulst & Smith 1988, Cole & Kisseberth 1994: §5, van der Hulst & van der Weijer 1995: 523, Finley 2008b: §9, Jurgec 2011: ch. 8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%