2000
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8705.00272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two types of shock in modernity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although historians have published widely on the function of memory in relation to regimes of historicity and memorial culture in Europe as a result of the two world wars (Assmann, 1999; Bann, 1995; Gross, 1992; Hartog, 2003), these studies tend to situate memory within a culture of time implicitly tied to a model of modernity characterized by the experience of ‘trauma’ or ‘shock’ from a sociopolitical perspective, and thus an ‘anxiety-producing entity that must be thought in relation to management, regulation, storage, and representation’ (Armstrong, 2003; Doane, 1996: 314). My analysis does not engage directly with memory in the fin de siecle, which is a vast and well-established topic in its own right (Le Goff, 1992; Nora, 1984–92; Terdiman, 1993).…”
Section: The ‘Time-sense’ and Temporal Malfunction In Early Psychiatrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although historians have published widely on the function of memory in relation to regimes of historicity and memorial culture in Europe as a result of the two world wars (Assmann, 1999; Bann, 1995; Gross, 1992; Hartog, 2003), these studies tend to situate memory within a culture of time implicitly tied to a model of modernity characterized by the experience of ‘trauma’ or ‘shock’ from a sociopolitical perspective, and thus an ‘anxiety-producing entity that must be thought in relation to management, regulation, storage, and representation’ (Armstrong, 2003; Doane, 1996: 314). My analysis does not engage directly with memory in the fin de siecle, which is a vast and well-established topic in its own right (Le Goff, 1992; Nora, 1984–92; Terdiman, 1993).…”
Section: The ‘Time-sense’ and Temporal Malfunction In Early Psychiatrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his analysis of shock in modernity, Tim Armstrong sees modern shock as directly connected to everyday life and the technologies of the urban such as the telephone, trains, and tramways. 34 Thus shock need not necessarily come from a particular package of economic and political reforms, but can carry a more or less constant existence through sometimes barely noticeable changes in the technologies surrounding everyday existence. According to this argument, shock can be present in different ways at all points in time (even before the so-called period of modernity), yet is intensified in modern times because of the character as well as the overwhelming presence of these technologies in our everyday lives.…”
Section: Shock and Practices Of Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With Holland's and Davoine and Gaudillière's arguments in mind, I wish to venture a speculative hypothesis about a potential effect of the experience of reading Atonement, one which might also be applicable to other texts that deal with the mass calamities of the twentieth century. For an attempt to tease out the differences between shock and trauma in their relation to modernity, see Armstrong (2000). Thus, while McEwan's novel itself is necessarily incapable of producing a tuché through which the reader would be pierced by the real's precipitous irruption, the historical conditions that help to shape its fi eld of reception (and inform its production) are such that the text may trigger the reopening of psychic fi ssures engraved on the reading subject by the real's intergenerationally channeled force.…”
Section: Cultural Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%