2012
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-301989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-week urgent referrals for suspected childhood cancer: experience within a large tertiary centre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of particular note, the original statement ‘the 2-week wait is an effective referral route for ensuring the prompt diagnosis of childhood malignancies’ was rejected outright with just 12% support. This is consistent with other reports which show it is not useful for paediatric cancer, with at most 1%–3% of referred patients ultimately being diagnosed via this route9–11 and, conversely, over 95% of children with cancer not reaching the paediatric haematology/oncology service through the 2-week wait system 12 13…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of particular note, the original statement ‘the 2-week wait is an effective referral route for ensuring the prompt diagnosis of childhood malignancies’ was rejected outright with just 12% support. This is consistent with other reports which show it is not useful for paediatric cancer, with at most 1%–3% of referred patients ultimately being diagnosed via this route9–11 and, conversely, over 95% of children with cancer not reaching the paediatric haematology/oncology service through the 2-week wait system 12 13…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Since only 1%–3% of children referred via this route are ultimately diagnosed with malignancy,9–11 this inevitably leads to unnecessary parental anxiety for the vast majority. Conversely, more than 95% of children with cancer do not reach the oncology service through the 2-week wait system 12 13…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2 week fast track (2WFT) system is intended to help GPs identify features of childhood cancer, and mandates local hospital trusts with suitable specialists to see referred cases within 2 weeks. Other than a paper reporting fairly small numbers within a District General Hospital setting,2 and a follow-up letter from our institution reporting larger numbers,3 both published in this journal, there is a paucity of published data on the effectiveness of this system. Our initial letter3 reported figures over a 3 year period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other than a paper reporting fairly small numbers within a District General Hospital setting,2 and a follow-up letter from our institution reporting larger numbers,3 both published in this journal, there is a paucity of published data on the effectiveness of this system. Our initial letter3 reported figures over a 3 year period. We have continued to collect data, and have now analysed five consecutive years of activity, and have benchmarked our local figures against national data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(There’s a similar issue with referrals with lymphadenopathy in particular for suspected lymphoma, with the ‘two week wait’ systems being shown repeatedly3–5 to have a very low positive predictive value. In this instance, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline6 states explicitly that in adults it’s working with a 2% pickup threshold and that in children it should be considerably lower.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%