2012
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-4268(12)60004-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two wound-covering materials in the surgical treatment of oral submucous fibrosis: a clinical comparison

Abstract: Introduction: Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF), a chronic debilitating condition of the mouth, has been treated both surgically and non-surgically, but non-surgical methods yield inconsistent results. The surgical methods essentially comprise of bilateral sectioning of fibrous bands with or without coronoidectomy followed by covering of the surgical defect with a graft or a wound dressing material such as collagen sheet.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of medical and physical therapies for OSF management are shown in Table 3 [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and those of representative surgical therapies are summarized in Table 4. [36][37][38][39][40]…”
Section: Tre Atmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of medical and physical therapies for OSF management are shown in Table 3 [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and those of representative surgical therapies are summarized in Table 4. [36][37][38][39][40]…”
Section: Tre Atmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the disease at the intermediate or advanced stage, physical and/or surgical therapies are necessary for alleviating symptoms of pain of oral mucosa and for increasing mouth opening. The results of medical and physical therapies for OSF management are shown in Table and those of representative surgical therapies are summarized in Table …”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the use of collagen membrane following excision of fibrotic bands in the management of oral submucous fibrosis, though statistically not significant gave better results with respect to post operative mouth opening as seen with a 6-month follow up. Pradhan et al [33] also in a similar study found a significant difference in the postoperative mouth opening, an insignificant difference for post surgical morbidity and higher grades of surgical convenience in using collagen sheet as a wound dressing material as compared to buccal pad of fat. Reddy et al [39] found good results in cases of OSMF when they impregnated dexamethasone in the collagen graft after excision of fibrous bands.…”
Section: Collagen For Coverage Of Soft Tissue Defects Of Oral Mucosa mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…[32] Other reconstructive options which have been used in the past include nasolabial flaps, transposition of the buccal pad of fat, dorsal tongue flap, radial forearm flaps, flaps of the temporalis fascia/muscle or both, palatal island flaps to cover surgical defects, each having their own advantages and shortcomings. [33,34] Use of island palatal flap has limitation such as its involvement with fibrosis and second molar tooth extraction is required for flap cover without tension. Bilateral palatal flaps leave a large raw area on palatal bones.…”
Section: Collagen For Coverage Of Soft Tissue Defects Of Oral Mucosa mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Pradhan et al did a comparative study to evaluate buccal fat pad and collagen sheets for defect closure and concluded collagen sheet is superior in outcome compared to buccal fat pad. 14 Borle R on his 25 advanced OSMF case series did melolabial flap reconstruction along with coronoidectomy and concluded it being an effective reconstructive option though the concern being the presence of extra oral scars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%