1988
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.151.3.605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-year clinical experience with a computed radiography system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System), images are acquired from several modalities including CR (Computed Radiography) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. An image acquisition device is interfaced to the PACS by an acquisition host computer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System), images are acquired from several modalities including CR (Computed Radiography) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. An image acquisition device is interfaced to the PACS by an acquisition host computer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the conventional computer architecture uses a byte aligned format, each 10-bit pixel is treated as 2 bytes worth of data, the entire image then requires 8 megabytes (Mbytes) of disk space. Our experience with a clinical picture archiving and communication system (PACS) in the pediatric radiology section indicated that at normal procedural load, approximately 1800 images are produced per month (Kangarloo et al 1988), filling one Hitachi optical disk juke box (64 platters, 2.6 gigabyte/platter) to capacity in two years. Transferring images within a radiological department, from either acquisition to storage or storage to review, also suffers from severe communication bottleneck when a high collision rate cuts ethernet performance to under 1 Mbit/s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It offers potential advantages over filmscreen radiography, such as image archiving, transmission, processing and display (16). Greater dynamic range and increased detector efficiency (15, 21) results in fewer repeat exposures (6,10,14) and allows lower radiation doses (6,14,16,17). Furthermore, the images may be evaluated only on monitors, eliminating film-based images in radiology departments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%