The authors report full-information longitudinal age gradients in 4 intellectual abilities on the basis of 6-year longitudinal changes in 132 individuals (mean age at T 1 ϭ 78.27, age range ϭ 70 -100) from the Berlin Aging Study. Relative to the cross-sectional parent sample (N ϭ 516, mean age at T 1 ϭ 84.92 years), this sample was positively selected because of differential mortality and experimental attrition. Perceptual speed, memory, and fluency declined with age. In contrast, knowledge remained stable up to age 90, with evidence for decline thereafter. Age gradients were more negative in old old (n ϭ 66, mean age at T 1 ϭ 83.04) than in old (n ϭ 66, mean age at T 1 ϭ 73.77) participants. Rates of decline did not differ reliably between men and women or between participants with high versus low life-history status. They conclude that intellectual development after age 70 varies by distance to death, age, and intellectual ability domain.On the basis of 6-year longitudinal data from the Berlin Aging Study (BASE), the present article investigates the fate of intellectual abilities in old and very old age. Specifically, its goal is to examine six themes in cognitive aging research: (a) the magnitude of mortality-associated and experimental selectivity effects and their relation to age, (b) the degree of convergence between crosssectional and longitudinal age gradients, (c) the ability-specific differences in the magnitude of age-based changes in the longitudinal sample, (d) the acceleration of decline in old-old age, (e) the relation of gender and life-history variables to level and longitudinal change in intellectual functioning, and (f) the differential association of the fluid mechanics and crystallized pragmatics of intelligence with measures of cultural versus biological indicators. In addition to the description of age changes in intellectual functioning in very old age, we also illustrate methodological issues associated with both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies involving old and very old individuals.The present study is closely related to other in-depth longitudinal investigations of intelligence in old and very old age, such as the Australian Longitudinal Study (Anstey, Luszcz, Giles, & Andrews, 2001;Anstey, Luszcz, & Sanchez, 2001), the Seattle Longitudinal Study (Schaie, 1996), the Victoria Longitudinal Study (Hultsch, Hertzog, Dixon, & Small, 1998), and the Kungsholmen project on a population 75 years and over (Hill, Wahlin, Winblad, & Bäckman, 1995; for other longitudinal studies with the focus on old age, see also Colsher & Wallace, 1991;Giambra, Arenberg, Zonderman, Kawas, & Costa, 1995;Schaie & Hofer, 2001;Sliwinski & Buschke, 1999;Zelinski & Burnight, 1997). At the same time, it differs from most of these earlier investigations by a combination of three features: (a) the effect-sized-based quantification of selection effects, (b) the decomposition of these effects into mortality-associated and study components (experimental attrition), and (c) the statistical comparisons of cross-secti...