2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.reumae.2016.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-year Efficacy of tocilizumab in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The retention rates reported with other biologics are generally similar to those reported in the current analysis for abatacept (online supplemental table S3 ) [ 31 35 ]. In the clinical practice setting, a 61% retention rate was observed at 2 years for tocilizumab [ 35 ], whereas a registry study reported 3-year tocilizumab retention rates as 52% in bDMARD-naïve patients and 51% and 47% in patients with 1 or 2 prior bDMARD failures, respectively [ 32 ]. A population-based prospective study in France reported 2-year retention rates of 69% for rituximab, 39% for abatacept, and 63% for tocilizumab in patients with RA in routine practice [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The retention rates reported with other biologics are generally similar to those reported in the current analysis for abatacept (online supplemental table S3 ) [ 31 35 ]. In the clinical practice setting, a 61% retention rate was observed at 2 years for tocilizumab [ 35 ], whereas a registry study reported 3-year tocilizumab retention rates as 52% in bDMARD-naïve patients and 51% and 47% in patients with 1 or 2 prior bDMARD failures, respectively [ 32 ]. A population-based prospective study in France reported 2-year retention rates of 69% for rituximab, 39% for abatacept, and 63% for tocilizumab in patients with RA in routine practice [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In a smaller, single center observational study, the subgroup of patients who were RF-positive actually had a better response to tocilizumab 13 . In an open label study of 85 patients treated with tocilizumab from Spain, there was no difference in response by CCP or RF status 14 . In one phase IIIB clinical trial, there was no difference by RF status 15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%