2018
DOI: 10.1111/desc.12660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two‐year‐olds use adults' but not peers' points

Abstract: In the current study, 24- to 27-month-old children (N = 37) used pointing gestures in a cooperative object choice task with either peer or adult partners. When indicating the location of a hidden toy, children pointed equally accurately for adult and peer partners but more often for adult partners. When choosing from one of three hiding places, children used adults' pointing to find a hidden toy significantly more often than they used peers'. In interaction with peers, children's choice behavior was at chance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This response seems to be less pronounced in younger children, as for example two-year-olds differentiate between points from an adult compared to points from a peer (Kachel, Moore & Tomasello, 2018). However, at four years of age, children are able to avoid following pointing gestures in an object-choice-task when an experimenter explicitly states that she is going to point where the target item is not hidden (Palmquist, Kondrad & Norris, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This response seems to be less pronounced in younger children, as for example two-year-olds differentiate between points from an adult compared to points from a peer (Kachel, Moore & Tomasello, 2018). However, at four years of age, children are able to avoid following pointing gestures in an object-choice-task when an experimenter explicitly states that she is going to point where the target item is not hidden (Palmquist, Kondrad & Norris, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is uncommon that adults request object labels from toddlers. Because toddlers possess some understanding that adults are typically more competent sources of information than children (Kachel, Moore, & Tomasello, 2018), it is possible that 18‐month‐olds interpreted labelers’ questions as pragmatically incongruous or violating social conventions (e.g., Diesendruck & Shemer, 2006; see also Diesendruck, 2012, for a review on toddlers’ understanding of conventionality). For this reason, toddlers may have either distrusted both labelers or were confused by the their use of questions, which may have led to weaker encoding of novel information in both conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also follow a peer’s point to objects in their immediate environment (Franco et al, 2009) and respond appropriately to peers’ requests for objects expressed in pointing gestures and grasping movements (Hay, Castle, Davies, Demetriou, & Stimson, 1999; Hepach, Kante, & Tomasello, 2016). Infants and toddlers have been shown to point in order to share attention and provide information both with adults (Liszkowski, 2005; Liszkowski, Carpenter, Striano, & Tomasello, 2006; Liszkowski, Carpenter, & Tomasello, 2008) and peers (Franco et al, 2009; Kachel, Moore, & Tomasello, 2018). However, they engage in lower levels of pointing with peer partners (Franco et al, 2009; Kachel et al, 2018; Ninio, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infants and toddlers have been shown to point in order to share attention and provide information both with adults (Liszkowski, 2005; Liszkowski, Carpenter, Striano, & Tomasello, 2006; Liszkowski, Carpenter, & Tomasello, 2008) and peers (Franco et al, 2009; Kachel, Moore, & Tomasello, 2018). However, they engage in lower levels of pointing with peer partners (Franco et al, 2009; Kachel et al, 2018; Ninio, 2016). Authors discuss these findings in the light of pragmatic reasons: peers are less likely to reply appropriately to the intentions underlying communicative acts, and are poor sources of information (Ninio, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation