2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Year Outcomes of Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Lumbar Decompression with or without Interlaminar Stabilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raushmann et al 13 have recently completed a prospective, randomized, multi-center Level 1 clinical trial comparing decompression alone (DA) to D+ILS at 24-months in a 1:1 randomization of 230 patients. Patients must have failed 3 months of conservative treatment, be greater than 40 years old, report Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back pain ≥ 50, and have radiographically confirmed degenerative spinal stenosis.…”
Section: Coverage Rationale For Decompression With Interlaminar Stabimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raushmann et al 13 have recently completed a prospective, randomized, multi-center Level 1 clinical trial comparing decompression alone (DA) to D+ILS at 24-months in a 1:1 randomization of 230 patients. Patients must have failed 3 months of conservative treatment, be greater than 40 years old, report Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back pain ≥ 50, and have radiographically confirmed degenerative spinal stenosis.…”
Section: Coverage Rationale For Decompression With Interlaminar Stabimentioning
confidence: 99%